Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Obama's Orwellian Language
IBD Editorials ^ | January 25, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 01/26/2011 4:18:52 AM PST by Kaslin

War Of Words: Politicians of every stripe have long known that controlling the language of political conflict wins half the battle. The president cannot be allowed to misrepresent his record of fiscal irresponsibility.

Two years before writing "1984," George Orwell wrote an essay titled "Politics and the English Language." World War II had just ended and this British socialist with no utopian misconceptions about Josef Stalin's Soviet totalitarianism to the east believed that "the present political chaos is connected with the decay of language, and that one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end."

In "1984," the great warning novel of a dark future where the party has total authority over society, Orwell showed how a regime can control people through the perversion of words. Engraved on the wall of the mythical Oceania's "Ministry of Truth" are the slogans "War is Peace," "Freedom is Slavery" and "Ignorance is Strength."

A new slogan can now be added to that wall: "Spending is Investment."

Orwell pointed out that "political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: orwellian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2011 4:18:54 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"The president cannot be allowed to misrepresent his record of fiscal irresponsibility. "

That would be the every-lying, unintrustworthy, MSM, too.


2 posted on 01/26/2011 4:22:46 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Spending is Investment

In fairness, "progressives" have been using that euphemism for years. Clinton did it as well.

3 posted on 01/26/2011 4:23:13 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Bringing children to America without immigration documents is child abuse. Let's end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I didn’t watch last night, but it seems Obama failed again.

Lets face the facts. In 2012 a person can vote for more of the same misery and destruction OR they vote against it.

Seems the centist makeover is a total bust.


4 posted on 01/26/2011 4:26:50 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

centist=centrist


5 posted on 01/26/2011 4:27:51 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

The most evident idiocy were the people with the Ribbons. How completely lame can you get?


6 posted on 01/26/2011 4:29:25 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

0+0=0


7 posted on 01/26/2011 4:30:02 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I think he is now sub-Zero.


8 posted on 01/26/2011 4:34:09 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

All investment involves spending; that is a given. But to argue that any and all spending is therefore “investment” is patently untrue. These dissembling socialist demagogues are banking on the inability of the public to distinguish the difference.


9 posted on 01/26/2011 4:36:09 AM PST by Senator John Blutarski (The progress of government: republic, democracy, technocracy, bureaucracy, plutocracy, kleptocracy,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

I didn’t either. I watched Rush on the Golf channel, but changed the channel to FOX News during the commercials, making sure I had it on mute.


10 posted on 01/26/2011 4:42:06 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

Fairness is truth
Progressive is progressive

Fairness is a losing proposition when playing in competition with the left.


11 posted on 01/26/2011 4:42:43 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Senator John Blutarski

Up is down. War is peace. Good is bad. Right is wrong. Welcome to nobama world (aka Bizarro world). nobama is such a putz. Super Putz.


12 posted on 01/26/2011 4:42:58 AM PST by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This morning I was looking for all the accolades to the brilliance of Obama.

I think it must have been a confusion bomb. LOL

I can’t watch him. Watching him makes me cranky.


13 posted on 01/26/2011 4:48:30 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

I can’t listen or watch him. My TV is to the right, a few feet away from me. So I have to my head or my chair if I want to watch something, otherwise I just listen.


14 posted on 01/26/2011 4:55:27 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

That’s very good. Do you do these yourself?


15 posted on 01/26/2011 5:37:36 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Don't tell Obama what comes after a trillion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Clinton used “investment” for spending proposals, too. He was very brazen.


16 posted on 01/26/2011 6:21:51 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (/s, in case you need to ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

“progressive” itself is Orwellian.

“Progressives” have been around since Wilson or before.
They were fascists then, and they are fascists now.

There is nothing “progressive” about promoting neo-feudalism.


17 posted on 01/26/2011 6:24:49 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Actually, welcome to “the world” and the language of the prince of this world - the father of lies.

It isn’t any wonder that those of this world would turn language and truth inside out and upside down.


18 posted on 01/26/2011 6:25:55 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; Diogenesis

We actually aren’t supposed to post Ramirez’ cartoons, as they are “excerpt only”.

It’s too bad - he’s probably my favorite editoonist today.


19 posted on 01/26/2011 6:27:10 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

That last cartoon needs a hungry shark.


20 posted on 01/26/2011 10:24:52 AM PST by upchuck (When excerpting please use the entire 300 words we are allowed. No more one or two sentence posts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson