Posted on 01/24/2011 4:21:09 PM PST by RobinMasters
A much-overlooked comment by Barack Obama is getting a closer examination now that Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie has come up short in his plan to take care of a pressing election 2012 concern for the Democrats by producing Obama's birth certificate from the state's archives.
It was the comment by Obama himself at a 2009 international meeting that he was born eight months earlier than when his official story has claimed all along.
Freudian slip, confusion or the truth leaking out?
It was in April 19, 2009, at a press conference Obama gave at the Port of Spain in Trinidad and Tobago, Obama commented on a 90-minute diatribe that had been delivered by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega at the meeting the day before, and Obama suggested he was born in January 1961, three months before the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Specifically, Obama rejected Ortega's attack on the United States for the attempted Bay of Pigs invasion during the Kennedy administration by explaining: "I'm grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Did you all read this?
This could be the answer:
http://hillbuzz.org/2011/01/23/hawaii-ground-report-could-hawaiian-governor-neil-abercrombie-not-be-as-incompetent-and-foolish-as-he-appears-but-orchestrating-a-deliberate-birth-certificate-recovery-dead-end-to-cover-his-own-pap/
If several states now require birth certificates in order to get on the ballot, how will Obama get on the ballot in those states in his re-election bid? I thought he might not run again because of this issue but by all accounts he’s being prepared to run again in 2112,
I read that date as August 1, 1961 which he may have viewed as close enough for government work. I know the January date would fit your thesis better and further, the fact that his 8-1 date is off the 8-4 date might make you think he is using a Euro dating convention.
He is really not smart enough to pull this off and keep all the balls in the air at the same time.
LOL!!
I believe that Obama is controlled by someone else. He isn’t terribly bright. That’s obvious. He may have trouble remembering his created life scenario. Especially if he didn’t create it.
I’m not so sure he’ll be re-elected, but I’d put $20 down that McCain and Scott Brown will endorse him.
Yup — McCain pretty much campaigned for Hussein in 2008!
At HillBuzz:
http://hillbuzz.org/2011/01/23/hawaii-ground-report-could-hawaiian-governor-neil-abercrombie-not-be-as-incompetent-and-foolish-as-he-appears-but-orchestrating-a-deliberate-birth-certificate-recovery-dead-end-to-cover-his-own-pap/ also some VERY interesting and informative comments.
Scroll down
McCain endorsed him in 08
I met hi in Hawaii in 1980 wen I came back from deployment, I clearly remember meeting soemmone from mombassa, when i had just been there 3 months previous, early May 1980
Depends on where the date came from, if it was transcribed from a Kenyan document, it would be written as it is, and that is a date in January. Just who the information belongs to is anyone’s guess, it looks to me like the search picked up information from two individuals.
Bump
I really don’t think that is correct, but I will not rule it out.
Bump
Also, remember his campaign facebook account said he was 57 years old.
Interesting how the date on that document matches up quite nicely with his slip about the Bay of Pigs.
That would put the immaculate conception in April 1960 before Ann graduated from high school in Washinton. That also adds substance to the theory the Dunhams made the mad rush to Hawaii to hide the pregnancy and why Ann suddenly didn’t attend college as planned in Washington with her Mercer Island friends.
King Obama claims Ann was an au pair in Chicago. If true, then it would have had to have been the summer of ‘60. Shipping her off to Davis would also fit in the hiding the pregnancy. But then it all falls apart with her attending the U of H fall semester ‘60. Unless, of course, things weren’t working out and the Dunhams brought her home.
It would also be an explaination of why he’s a head taller than his elementary school classmates.
However, there’s still that nagging question of, “Who’s yer daddy?” Davis? Malcolm X? A Mercer Island pool boy? Whomever he was, he certainly wasn’t the patsy, O Sr.
The Obama/Soretoro name play would get poo-pooed by the msm as a rose by any other name hooey. However, the usurper knowingly used an illegal name on his Chicago bar application, on his Senate run and finally to get elected and sworn in as the POTUS. That, for any of us little people, would see us behind behind bars for a very long time.
Even from a practical standpoint, he would never give up a job where he is not expected to do anything, yet still enjoy the best perks of any job in America. There's no community organizer job anywhere that feeds you lobster every night, allows you to play golf on the finest courses for free, always has an open basketball court waiting for you every Sunday at the gym, and provides you with free entertainment in your own house every Wednesday by the biggest celebrities.
Walk away from that? Even Obama isn't that stupid.
The “Hiding of the Name” theory is hardly new, many on FR believed it was the simplest likely explanation (Occam’s Razor)way back in 2008.
No, the record says "08-01-1961," which, if you're a civilian working in the county clerk's office, is August 1st, 1961 (which is still at odds with August 4th, the usual birthdate given).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.