[Sub-Driver]

Try cutting the tax burden on businesses and less regulation........

He'll never get it, never........

[marron]

That should be dead on arrival.

We did not send these guys to Washington to help Obama govern; we sent them to stop him.

[Paladin2]

"...new government spending on infrastructure, education and research.."

Good idea. We need infrastructure to grease the skids to slide 0 outa office, need to educate the sheeple as to the fundamentals of America's greatness and the risk of 0think, and need to spend on research to make sure a S0r0$ puppet never makes it to the top of the heap again.

Yes we can. We are the ones we have been waiting for.

[LibLieSlayer]

Oh I hope that he does... one thing the MAJORITY of voting Americans know... when your family is financially bankrupt... you do not get out of debt by "investing" in purchasing more stuff on credit cards. I PRAY that he does this... it will be the end of all of this bullshit “moving to the center” crap... and krauthammer’s head will explode... and I want that filmed in 1080P!

LLS

[EverOnward]

The greatest threat to our national security is our debt.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/25/joint-chiefs-chair-says-debt-is-the-greatest-threat-to-national-security/

“I was shown the figures the other day by the comptroller of the Pentagon that said that the interest on our debt is $571 billion in 2012,” Mullen said at a breakfast hosted by The Hill. “That is, noticeably, about the size of the defense budget. It is not sustainable.”

“We are rapidly approaching the point at which we can no longer fund a robust defense system for the US and the Western world. Our ability to maintain forward strategies to engage and destroy terrorist networks will disappear, but not before we have to scale back our military presence around the world. We have overspent for decades across the board, and the interest payments on the national debt alone will cost us more than our defense systems — on top of which the heavy burden of unfunded entitlement liabilities will start cresting as the Baby Boomers enter retirement. Steve Eggleston updates us on the quickening slide of Social Security into the red, just to remind us of that fact.”

[LibFreeOrDie]

“...initiatives aimed at building the renewable-energy sector”

Hey, Obama, a “green” solar company that got $58,000,000 in taxpayer money closed its factory in MA and moved 800 jobs to China.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2011/01/12/evergreen_solar_to_cut_800_jobs_as_it_tries_to_compete_with_china/

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2011/01/20/in_bid_to_be_green_governor_patrick_bungles_investment/

[Lurker]

This guy is out of his mind.

[Gene Eric]

He gets it. He wants more power of which he’ll never have enough.

[Mygirlsmom]

Call for Boosting 'Competitiveness'

Trouble is, he wants to compete with Zimbabwe

[screaminsunshine]

Obama Sucks. He is a complete disaster. He will be gone in two years. He can not succeed. We just have to survive him.

[Qbert]

I thought you might get a kick out of this, because I remembered you telling me the exact same thing a few days ago(!):

—From the article posted:

“President Barack Obama will call for new government spending on infrastructure, education and research in his State of the Union address Tuesday.”

—What you said on another thread:

“When Obama campaigned, he said he would decrease the deficit. They asked him for specifics on where he would cut the budget.
Obama said: “I will cut the budget by investing in roads and bridges, investing in education, and in green technology.
In his first year in office, Obama said he would stimulate economic growth. They asked him how.
Obama said: “I will stimulate the economy by investing in roads and bridges, education, and green technology.

In his second year in office, Obama said that he could create millions of jobs. They asked him how he would create jobs.
bama said: “I will create millions of jobs by investing in roads and bridges, education, and green technology.

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, we enter the third year ...

And the answer is still “investing in roads and bridges, education, and green technology.”

[Popman]

must make targeted investments

Taxpayer funded "targeted investments" are code for Democratic political payoffs to their cronies

Nothing more, nothing less

Real capitalist investment is targeted for regulation and all sort of government hurdles to kill it eventually

[chuckee]

The man is a spending addict. He could start his own chapter of Spenders Anonymous. Hello, my name is Barry and I am Spender.Hello, Barry.....

[Popman]

Try cutting the tax burden on businesses and less regulation........ He'll never get it, never........

Zero gets it......... but he believes capitalism is inherently evil and unfair and he must force us into an egalitarian world where capitalism is reigned in by government which is the answer to all problems.

[GeronL]

I am sure this stunes all our beeber.

NOT

[PghBaldy]

infrastructure, education and research Unions, unions and unions. Democrats too. Funny how the party of government always wants more of it.

[K-oneTexas]

Hey, he read the book ... OPM! That is ‘Other People’s Money’.

He loves spending OPM, cause we have soooooooo much of it.

I truely wish someone would wake-up in Washington.

[rockinqsranch]

He intends to bankrupt this Nation.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

“Targeted Investments” —> cronyism; political favors and payback; waste of good taxpayer money; failed “industrial policy.” Keep the money in the private sector and let it most efficiently allocate it to where it needs to go.

[Tzimisce]

We can spend more money WHILE cutting the budget.

It’s so easy. :)

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

So it will be a campaign speech? I am so shocked. Will the GOP and dems be wearing t-shirts found on their seats?