Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to Push New Spending
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 01/21/2011 4:58:43 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Obama to Push New Spending State of Union Speech to Call for Boosting 'Competitiveness' While Nodding to Need for Budget Cuts

President Barack Obama will call for new government spending on infrastructure, education and research in his State of the Union address Tuesday, sharpening his response to Republicans in Congress who are demanding deep budget cuts, people familiar with the speech said.

Mr. Obama will argue that the U.S., even while trying to reduce its budget deficit, must make targeted investments to foster job growth and boost U.S. competitiveness in the world economy. The new spending could initiatives aimed at building the renewable-energy sector—which received billions of dollars in stimulus funding—and rebuilding roads to improve transportation, people familiar with the matter said. Money to restructure the No Child Left Behind law's testing mandates and institute more competitive grants also could be included.

In arguing that U.S. competitiveness is at stake, Mr. Obama plans to use his nationally televised speech to try to frame the spending debate with Republicans that is expected to dominate Congress in the coming months. "We seek to do everything we can to spur hiring and ensure our nation can compete with anybody on the planet," Mr. Obama said Friday after touring a General Electric Co. plant in Schenectady, N.Y. He cited clean-energy manufacturing, infrastructure and education as keys to competitiveness.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; obama; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
Try cutting the tax burden on businesses and less regulation........

He'll never get it, never........

1 posted on 01/21/2011 4:58:46 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

That should be dead on arrival.

We did not send these guys to Washington to help Obama govern; we sent them to stop him.


2 posted on 01/21/2011 5:00:45 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

so much for triangulation ..... Obama is toast in 2012.


3 posted on 01/21/2011 5:05:53 PM PST by RED SOUTH (Follow me on twitter @redsouth72)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"...new government spending on infrastructure, education and research.."

Good idea. We need infrastructure to grease the skids to slide 0 outa office, need to educate the sheeple as to the fundamentals of America's greatness and the risk of 0think, and need to spend on research to make sure a S0r0$ puppet never makes it to the top of the heap again.

Yes we can. We are the ones we have been waiting for.

4 posted on 01/21/2011 5:07:12 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Oh I hope that he does... one thing the MAJORITY of voting Americans know... when your family is financially bankrupt... you do not get out of debt by "investing" in purchasing more stuff on credit cards. I PRAY that he does this... it will be the end of all of this bullshit “moving to the center” crap... and krauthammer’s head will explode... and I want that filmed in 1080P!

LLS

5 posted on 01/21/2011 5:08:20 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The greatest threat to our national security is our debt.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/25/joint-chiefs-chair-says-debt-is-the-greatest-threat-to-national-security/

“I was shown the figures the other day by the comptroller of the Pentagon that said that the interest on our debt is $571 billion in 2012,” Mullen said at a breakfast hosted by The Hill. “That is, noticeably, about the size of the defense budget. It is not sustainable.”

“We are rapidly approaching the point at which we can no longer fund a robust defense system for the US and the Western world. Our ability to maintain forward strategies to engage and destroy terrorist networks will disappear, but not before we have to scale back our military presence around the world. We have overspent for decades across the board, and the interest payments on the national debt alone will cost us more than our defense systems — on top of which the heavy burden of unfunded entitlement liabilities will start cresting as the Baby Boomers enter retirement. Steve Eggleston updates us on the quickening slide of Social Security into the red, just to remind us of that fact.”


6 posted on 01/21/2011 5:14:41 PM PST by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Sub-Driver.
new government spending on infrastructure, education and research... targeted investments to foster job growth and boost U.S. competitiveness in the world economy
Y'know, because it worked so well before. Research -- global warming and community organizing. Education -- global warming and community organizing. Targeted investments -- carbon credit scams and community organizing. Job growth -- public sector 'employment' and community organizing. Infrastructure -- concrete production creates CO2, so renewable technology (rickshaws over corderoy roads) and community organizing.


7 posted on 01/21/2011 5:15:27 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“...initiatives aimed at building the renewable-energy sector”

Hey, Obama, a “green” solar company that got $58,000,000 in taxpayer money closed its factory in MA and moved 800 jobs to China.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2011/01/12/evergreen_solar_to_cut_800_jobs_as_it_tries_to_compete_with_china/

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2011/01/20/in_bid_to_be_green_governor_patrick_bungles_investment/


8 posted on 01/21/2011 5:18:14 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This guy is out of his mind.


9 posted on 01/21/2011 5:21:00 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He gets it. He wants more power of which he’ll never have enough.


10 posted on 01/21/2011 5:28:28 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Call for Boosting 'Competitiveness'

Trouble is, he wants to compete with Zimbabwe

11 posted on 01/21/2011 5:30:03 PM PST by Mygirlsmom (We had it wrong the whole time. Khrushchev actually said, "We will Barry you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama Sucks. He is a complete disaster. He will be gone in two years. He can not succeed. We just have to survive him.


12 posted on 01/21/2011 5:34:07 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I thought you might get a kick out of this, because I remembered you telling me the exact same thing a few days ago(!):

—From the article posted:

“President Barack Obama will call for new government spending on infrastructure, education and research in his State of the Union address Tuesday.”

—What you said on another thread:

“When Obama campaigned, he said he would decrease the deficit. They asked him for specifics on where he would cut the budget.
Obama said: “I will cut the budget by investing in roads and bridges, investing in education, and in green technology.
In his first year in office, Obama said he would stimulate economic growth. They asked him how.
Obama said: “I will stimulate the economy by investing in roads and bridges, education, and green technology.

In his second year in office, Obama said that he could create millions of jobs. They asked him how he would create jobs.
bama said: “I will create millions of jobs by investing in roads and bridges, education, and green technology.

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, we enter the third year ...

And the answer is still “investing in roads and bridges, education, and green technology.”


13 posted on 01/21/2011 5:38:35 PM PST by Qbert ("I seem to smell the stench of appeasement in the air" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
must make targeted investments

Taxpayer funded "targeted investments" are code for Democratic political payoffs to their cronies

Nothing more, nothing less

Real capitalist investment is targeted for regulation and all sort of government hurdles to kill it eventually

14 posted on 01/21/2011 5:44:25 PM PST by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Barry wants more money for windmills...and sunshine, lollipops and roses. The House has an answer for him.....NO, NO, A THOUSAND TIMES NO!
15 posted on 01/21/2011 5:48:32 PM PST by JPG (There is hope for America and her name is Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The man is a spending addict. He could start his own chapter of Spenders Anonymous. Hello, my name is Barry and I am Spender.Hello, Barry.....


16 posted on 01/21/2011 5:50:01 PM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Try cutting the tax burden on businesses and less regulation........ He'll never get it, never........

Zero gets it......... but he believes capitalism is inherently evil and unfair and he must force us into an egalitarian world where capitalism is reigned in by government which is the answer to all problems.

17 posted on 01/21/2011 5:52:01 PM PST by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
"That should be dead on arrival"

I'd like to think that's true, that the new GOP House has some 'nads.

History tells me that by the time bummer's speech is over the House will be ordering a new box of checks. There's just so MUCH money in DC that it corrupts the vast majority of those who arrive there.

You compound that with the absolute refusal of the American Electorate (the majority of them) to give up anything and the outcome is certain.

18 posted on 01/21/2011 5:55:15 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I am sure this stunes all our beeber.

NOT


19 posted on 01/21/2011 6:14:52 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“...new government spending on infrastructure, education and research..”

What ever happened to the stimulus/QE money?


20 posted on 01/21/2011 6:21:14 PM PST by oiler (Reagan Republicans Unite!!!!! It's the Constitution Stupid. Palin and Bachmann in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson