Another thought. Sticking with the hospital donor fraud theory, could Abercrombie be constructing a defense in advance of exposure, that he didn’t commit fraud because he himself was deceived by Obama? Because it’s not fraud if you really believed it to be true, only if you knew or should have known that you were propagating a falsehood. But if he can portray himself as the victim of another’s deceit, the worst he can be accused of is being negligent in his duty to investigate. It might explain his bumbling appearance. He’s not covering for Obama. He’s trying to find cover for himself. Perhaps. Just a theory ...
Another thought. Sticking with the hospital donor fraud theory, could Abercrombie be constructing a defense in advance of exposure, that he didn’t commit fraud because he himself was deceived by Obama? Because it’s not fraud if you really believed it to be true, only if you knew or should have known that you were propagating a falsehood. But if he can portray himself as the victim of another’s deceit, the worst he can be accused of is being negligent in his duty to investigate. It might explain his bumbling appearance. He’s not covering for Obama. He’s trying to find cover for himself. Perhaps. Just a theory ...
This is the only way one can rationalize why this guy suddenly brought up this issue when the MSM and others had all but buried it?
I have been of the opinion Abercrombie believed that Barry had all of his bona fides in place toherwise how else could he have gotten on the ballot in Hawaii in 2008?
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/