Another thought. Sticking with the hospital donor fraud theory, could Abercrombie be constructing a defense in advance of exposure, that he didn’t commit fraud because he himself was deceived by Obama? Because it’s not fraud if you really believed it to be true, only if you knew or should have known that you were propagating a falsehood. But if he can portray himself as the victim of another’s deceit, the worst he can be accused of is being negligent in his duty to investigate. It might explain his bumbling appearance. He’s not covering for Obama. He’s trying to find cover for himself. Perhaps. Just a theory ...
This is the only way one can rationalize why this guy suddenly brought up this issue when the MSM and others had all but buried it?
I have been of the opinion Abercrombie believed that Barry had all of his bona fides in place toherwise how else could he have gotten on the ballot in Hawaii in 2008?
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/
snip- “New analysis of Democrat Party’s official 2008 Certification of Nominations for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 were to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws, media accounts and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a private hearing with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from the Hawaiian ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.”
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/