Skip to comments.
USS Ronald Reagan to Spend a Year at Bremerton Naval Yard
KOMO News ^
| 1/19/2011
| Kitsap Sun
Posted on 01/19/2011 10:16:45 AM PST by hoagy62
BREMERTON, Wash. (AP) - The aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan is scheduled for work at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in January 2012.
The Kitsap Sun says it will undergo maintenance similar to the yearlong $250 million job the shipyard began in December on the aircraft carrier Nimitz.
(Excerpt) Read more at komonews.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: bremerton; carrier; navair; ussreagan; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
01/19/2011 10:16:51 AM PST
by
hoagy62
To: Fred; Chattering Class of 58; SeattleBruce; tarator; 21twelve; Feasor13; matt1234; Bosun; ...
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
Quick link:
WA State Board
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
2
posted on
01/19/2011 10:19:54 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Why are TSA exempt from their own searches?)
To: hoagy62
I have had the great pleasure of seeing her from the outside in San Diego.
3
posted on
01/19/2011 10:20:22 AM PST
by
ColdOne
(Government "help" to business is just as disastrous as government persecution...Ayn Rand)
To: hoagy62
And when it comes out of the “yards” it will be MORE screwed up than when it went in(it will be typical drunk, drug addled “yardbird” UNION CRAP work). It will take the Ship’s Company almost 6 months to put it back to rights.
To: hoagy62
Reagen got an Aircraft Carrier, and the latest and greatest example of American Military power.
carter got a submarine, which perfectly mirrors his presidency: no one can see it and it can cause great damage when and where no on is looking.
Both Bushes will probably also get Aircraft Carriers, or destroyers (who chooses?)
the TOTUS-reader deserves a dingy with a hole in the bottom, patched with bubble-gum.
5
posted on
01/19/2011 10:22:10 AM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Nothing sharpens the mind like not being able to get a job. /Nonstatist)
To: ColdOne
I think it might be worth a trip across the Narrows Bridge to go see her when she arrives. I’ve seen the USS Abraham Lincoln when she was at Naval Station Everett. It just amazes me how BIG those ships are.
“90,000 tons of diplomacy.”
6
posted on
01/19/2011 10:25:52 AM PST
by
hoagy62
(.)
To: US Navy Vet
How old is the ship? I thought it was less than 5 years old? Union scum at the dockyard will wreck it.
7
posted on
01/19/2011 10:26:38 AM PST
by
Frantzie
(Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
To: freedumb2003
"the TOTUS-reader deserves a dingy with a hole in the bottom, patched with bubble-gum."...... The U.S.S. TOTUS....
To: hoagy62
Depends on how many tweaker’s are in the union crew.
9
posted on
01/19/2011 10:31:04 AM PST
by
Cheetahcat
( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
To: Frantzie
It seems too soon to stand it down for a year. If there are new systems to install, maybe. But it was state of the art a few years ago.
I don't understand how wear and tear requires a year to repair at this point.
10
posted on
01/19/2011 10:31:14 AM PST
by
Never on my watch
(When Obama was born, the movie "The Manchurian Candidate" was in production. Coincidence?)
To: freedumb2003
GHW Bush did get a carrier. GW Bush may or may not.
I liked it better when carriers bore the names of
battles, insects, or historic warships. We need
a Kearsarge, an Oriskany, a Wasp, a Hornet.
11
posted on
01/19/2011 10:36:06 AM PST
by
rahbert
To: Never on my watch
12
posted on
01/19/2011 10:36:13 AM PST
by
WellyP
To: freedumb2003
It's too early to tell whether or not "W" will get a carrier, but daddy (H.W.) did.
USS George H. W. Bush, CVN-77
13
posted on
01/19/2011 10:37:00 AM PST
by
cuz_it_aint_their_money
(I'll show their president the exact same respect and loyalty that they have shown my president.)
To: WellyP
She was commissioned on 12 July 2003 at Naval Station Norfolk.
14
posted on
01/19/2011 10:37:35 AM PST
by
WellyP
To: rahbert
Wasp and Hornet were named for naval ships during the Revolutionary War and early Navy history, not for the insects per se.
15
posted on
01/19/2011 10:43:45 AM PST
by
pasquale
To: hoagy62
Yes it would be a wonderful sight! I had a photo once of the U.S.S. Arizona Memorial with a newer ship next to it. Just amazing.
16
posted on
01/19/2011 10:46:40 AM PST
by
ColdOne
(Government "help" to business is just as disastrous as government persecution...Ayn Rand)
To: rahbert; cuz_it_aint_their_money
I have no idea how I forgot that.
Sometimes I lose entire decades. It seems like just yesterday I was wearing a blue leisure suit...
17
posted on
01/19/2011 10:47:25 AM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Nothing sharpens the mind like not being able to get a job. /Nonstatist)
To: Never on my watch
Nor do I, one year in the yard for an 8 year old vessel? Are they tearing down the reactors?
To: US Navy Vet
You mean our naval shipyards now resemble those of the old Soviet Union? The Soviets lost one of their boomer subs (K-219) due mainly by the crappy pipefitting work by shipyard workers fueled by vodka.
19
posted on
01/19/2011 10:52:32 AM PST
by
Fred Hayek
(FUBO! I salute you with the soles of my shoes.)
To: magslinger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson