Posted on 01/19/2011 12:14:16 AM PST by pissant
Washington (CNN) -- A new national poll indicates that 56% of all Americans have an unfavorable view of Sarah Palin, an all-time high for the former Alaska governor.
That 56% unfavorable figure is up seven points from just before the midterm elections, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll released Wednesday morning.
Thirty-eight percent of people questioned in the poll say they have a favorable view of the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, down two points from October.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
And the obligatory FWIW.
She’s told the truth. This is a measure, at worst, of how many people hate the truth.
FWIW - WE, of the Sarah Palin Ping List, don’t give a rip.
LOL. Keep at it.
She isnn’t suffering from over exposure so much as invented headlines not of her own making.
I don’t think it has much to do with her stand on rejecting the MSM’s baloney. It has to do with oversaturation.
Some are more susceptible to propaganda than others.
It is hard to believe such numbers coming out of a CNN poll. I know that the liberals hate her, but there are not that many liberals in this country.
However, she likely needs to get more media exposer for those moderates and conservatives who are uncomfortable with Sarah will feel more comfortable with her.
Wouldn’t the poll be more accurate if they asked people outside their own newsroom? Just sayin.
MORE? You are yanking my chain
LOL
I expressed the idea one evening that perhaps Palin wasn’t the ideal candidate and many who chastised me for saying so brought you up.
These people who excoriated me OBVIOUSLY changed my mind...
I’ve been called every name in the book and then some. So I guess if they call you pissant, it’s the ultimate insult.
“Ronald Reagan”
Well...when you poll “adults”...it’s deja vu all over again. Supposedly, nobody liked him either. ;o)
I like Sarah ;-)
No one can change that.
Not even the media and its trumped up polls.
That’s what they did with Obama. He has all over the TV from 2004 to 2007 when he announced and then it was even more leading all the way to the election.
Sarah’s numbers will continue to rise and she needs to continue to do different types of TV.
However, I not sure if her family being on TV really helps her.
>> Ronald Reagan took a radio show after his failed 1980 primary campaign, even though he was also offered a TV show...
1980?
Doh! ‘76.
CNN has NO credibility in making news by taking a weekend poll on a subject they chummed the waters for days. I can’t even find what was/were the question(s) asked.
It was on CNN right after some one at the White House gave a ‘written’ response to the shooting, Eddie Henry gave a live performance from the White House. AND Eddie was contrasting and comparing the political gain that was out there for the taking as old BJClinton did over OKC. I later sought to find the video of this first report from the White House by Eddie and it was NOT anywhere on the CNN website.
>> Oh, and the obligatory photo.
FWIW, that’s funny onyx.
Are we to presume that Sarah will get a fair shake from the same ‘target’ audience the MSM inundated with deceit and omissions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.