Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Republican Party Finished?
The American Thinker ^ | December 29, 2010 | Michael Filozof

Posted on 12/29/2010 3:23:30 AM PST by Scanian

The lame-duck session of the 111th Congress proved one thing beyond a doubt: the Republican Party does not represent the interests of conservatives. Despite the midterm election tidal wave, in which the Republican Party gained 63 House seats (eclipsing its historic1994 success against Clinton), congressional Republicans failed to leverage their victory into political clout and collapsed like a house of cards in the lame-duck session.

The last two weeks ought to have sickened conservatives. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell spectacularly failed to hold his caucus together to even delay ratification of the START treaty until the 112th Congress is seated in January. Republican leftists Olympia Snowe and Lisa Murkowski sided with Democrats to end the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, forcing the gay agenda from the streets of San Francisco right into the U.S. Marine Corps. Congressional Republicans agreed to cut FICA taxes for Social Security (which is underfunded already) and expand the Democratic Party's welfare state constituency by extending unemployment benefits -- in exchange for maintaining current tax rates for a paltry two years. The deal will add billions to the deficit. Tea Party darling Scott Brown, mocked by Obama for driving a truck in his insurgent 2009 campaign in which he stole "Ted Kennedy's seat" from the Democrats, voted for Obama's agenda on all of these issues.

Give the Democratic devils their due. They are astute students of Machiavelli.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; dadt; dontaskdonttell; gop; homosexualagenda; mcconnell; start; taxbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: Scanian

We either kick out the posers, establishment goons and progressives or the GOP will continue to betray the hard-working American people.

My guess is the establishment will win over in the next couple of years and in 2012 we will see a new principled party that could actually have an impact.

Just how many times do we need to be betrayed before the American people say...enough already?


81 posted on 12/29/2010 11:37:40 AM PST by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
We need someone who will strike fear in the heart of Senate Democrats.

We could also use someone who will strike fear in the heart of Senate RINOs too. We didn't get Card Check, Cap & Tax and another round of amnesty for illegal aliens because the GOP in the Senate was so effective, IMHO. Dingy Harry couldn't get the votes from his rats. Rats moved to the right to take Congress in 2006 with pro Second Amendent, pro-life and fiscally conservative nominees where needed. They expanded their majority in 2008 with similar nominees, despite Obama who ran a campaign that obscured his past.

82 posted on 12/29/2010 11:42:25 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

-—The RNC is a mechanism set up by the state Republican parties to do several tasks.——

You are of course correct. I overstated and perhaps misstated my point. The RNC does serve a valuable purpose.

The rise of internet information and the ability to easily make direct donations to candidates with approved views make their campaigns national in fund raising.

A more correct statement would be that the RNC has lost some and perhaps much of the retail level funding. The grass roots is doing for its’self that which was once delegated to the RNC.


83 posted on 12/29/2010 4:31:38 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bert
You probably noticed that COD got nearly $8 million ~ much of it could have been used by other TEA Party candidates, or regular Republican candidates.

The mechanism allows the individual to directly fund folks but at the same time it's no longer a national campaign.

I think the way to deal with this is to crack down on the Republican label ~ (1) By forcing all candidates in a Republican primary to sign a statement that they will respect the results ~ and, oh, BTW, post a bond against your repudiation of your pledge, and (2) By requiring everybody using the Republican brand to redirect 25% of their individual funding to the RNC campaign committees for use in weak races where advertising may make a difference.

Most private individuals are usually not in a position to be able to identify other races of value ~ which should be a function performed by the RNC campaign committees.

Too often we find insiders trying to manipulate the RNC campaign committees into pre-selecting candidates before a primary. That should get a committee-man tossed out of the party.

We also need to reign in Congressional campaign committee organizations so that you don't have a Chairman, by himself, selecting another Scuzzyfuzzo ~

84 posted on 12/29/2010 4:39:43 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
I bolted the party during Bush's 2007 push of amnesty for illegals. The Tea party success is worth some wishful thinking that the GOP might wake up and be saved, but still there is no change in leadership where the RINOs are still firmly in control.
85 posted on 12/29/2010 4:58:02 PM PST by Jay Redhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Is the Republican Party Finished?

If we're lucky?

86 posted on 12/29/2010 8:07:23 PM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Did you hear the Texas congressman talking to Mark Steyn on Rush’s show today?

Don't know which you're talking about, but there are a lot of disgusting libs from here - large urban areas spawn them like roaches.

However, state-wise, we're looking pretty good. The overwhelming win of real conservatives in the Texas legislature this last election might get some unthinkable, good things done this year: voter I.D. law; strong anti-criminal alien laws; repudiation of unconstitutional federal laws, etc.

87 posted on 12/29/2010 8:12:54 PM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

He was definitely NOT a lib...he was not happy about the RINO comment of finishing up the legislation before the “new Republicans” arrived.

Too bad I missed his name...he entered Congress after the 2004 election, so he is about to start his 4th term, whatever his name is.


88 posted on 12/30/2010 2:53:39 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I did a quick review of the Texas Congressional Delegation and I’m pretty sure Steyn’s guest was Louie Gohmert.


89 posted on 12/30/2010 3:03:11 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I'm all in favor of trying to primary Brown and the Maine twins the next time around. But it's absurd to pretend that Brown sold himself as something that he is not now...

I found your post astute to that point. I don't think we can do better in Mass than Brown. We would be trading a Rockefeller Repub for a hard leftie.

Can we do better in Maine? I'm inclined to risk it...as a matter of principle. We can't let RINOs get too comfortable, and the Girls have been there long enough.

90 posted on 12/30/2010 9:14:04 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
It's really up to John Boehner and his cronies running the House to kill START ~ and given a choice between killing START and bailing out Ohio who do you think will win...

How?

91 posted on 12/30/2010 9:16:22 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Your post illustrates my thinking...we don't know we can't do better in Maine unless we try. Let's try.

I think Brown in Mass is a different case.

92 posted on 12/30/2010 9:19:00 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well said!!!


93 posted on 12/30/2010 9:20:23 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
(2) By requiring everybody using the Republican brand to redirect 25% of their individual funding to the RNC campaign committees for use in weak races where advertising may make a difference...

Challengers already face an uphill battle. You're proposing to make the hill steeper.

94 posted on 12/30/2010 9:23:17 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
START requires that funding be made to reprocess warheads. No appropriation may be made...... etc.

Just because the US signs on to a treaty doesn't mean the House of Representatives has to pay for it.

Republicans have been telling Obama to go back for some changes. He can go back for some changes now.

95 posted on 12/30/2010 9:23:50 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Jay Redhawk
I bolted the party during Bush's 2007 push of amnesty for illegals. The Tea party success is worth some wishful thinking that the GOP might wake up and be saved, but still there is no change in leadership where the RINOs are still firmly in control...

So...in your opinion, where do we go from here?

96 posted on 12/30/2010 9:24:40 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

Strawman argument ~ so what. Those may well be the weaker races ~ where we have a challenger going up against a well-entrenched incumbent.


97 posted on 12/30/2010 9:25:55 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

That would be interesting to watch. I have my doubts it would be successful. Obammy would find the money “somewhere.”


98 posted on 12/30/2010 9:26:51 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: gogeo; dirtboy
ANY Democrat running in Massachusetts is going to be a Leftwing Extremist ~ probably even one of those "send 'em to the camps" sort of Stalinists.

The place just isn't America anymore, so either we get rid of it ~ or we do what we can, but first off don't let in any more Stalinists than they already have.

99 posted on 12/30/2010 9:28:37 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Strawman argument ~ so what...

Strawman argument? You haven't thought it through, methinks.

100 posted on 12/30/2010 9:29:12 AM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson