Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China deploying carrier-sinking missile
The Washington Times ^ | December 27, 2010 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 12/27/2010 12:26:22 PM PST by jazusamo

China's military is deploying a new anti-ship ballistic missile that can sink U.S. aircraft carriers, a weapon that specialists say gives Beijing new power-projection capabilities that will affect U.S. support for Pacific allies.

Adm. Robert Willard, commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, disclosed to a Japanese newspaper on Sunday that the new anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) is now in the early stages of deployment after having undergone extensive testing.

"An analogy using a Western term would be 'initial operational capability (IOC),' whereby I think China would perceive that it has an operational capability now, but they continue to develop it," Adm. Willard told the Asahi Shimbun. "I would gauge it as about the equivalent of a U.S. system that has achieved IOC."

The four-star admiral, who has been an outspoken skeptic of China's claims that its large-scale military buildup is peaceful, said the U.S. deployment assessment is based on China's press reports and continued testing.

The new weapon, the "D" version of China's DF-21 medium-range missile, involves firing the mobile missile into space, returning into the atmosphere and then maneuvering it to its target

Military officials consider using ballistic missile against ships at sea to be a difficult task that requires a variety of air, sea and space sensors; navigation systems; and precision guidance technology — capabilities not typical of other Chinese missiles.

Asked about the integrated system, Adm. Willard said that "to have something that would be regarded as in its early operational stage would require that that system be able to accomplish its flight pattern as designed, by and large."

The admiral said that while the United States thinks "that the component parts of the anti-ship ballistic missile have been developed and tested," China's testing has not gone as far as a live-fire test...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carriermissile; china; clintonlegacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 12/27/2010 12:26:24 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We can deploy China sinking missiles...............


2 posted on 12/27/2010 12:28:11 PM PST by Red Badger (Whenever these vermin call you an 'idiot', you can be sure that you are doing to something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Obama is president. I aint worried.”

-Obamanoid voter


3 posted on 12/27/2010 12:28:47 PM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

4 posted on 12/27/2010 12:32:42 PM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
China deploying carrier-sinking missile

Bought and paid for by our debt to China.

5 posted on 12/27/2010 12:34:15 PM PST by vortigern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sink a carrier and we incinerate your five largest populated cities. The Russians would stand back and (quietly) applaud.


6 posted on 12/27/2010 12:34:21 PM PST by katana (Republican Politicians: Stupid is just part of what we do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

It’s not reassuring that Obama weakens our military and crams through START while China is aggressively building theirs.


7 posted on 12/27/2010 12:35:18 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vortigern

Like a sub-roc or as-roc? We have had for years. There is no need to destroy a carrier, we have other tools to simply stop it in the water so it cannot perform flight ops.


8 posted on 12/27/2010 12:36:14 PM PST by edcoil ("The only winning move is not to play")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nobody is going to use a carrier against China.

More likely Guam, Alaska and the mainland U.S.

Ships at sea are obsolete in today’s major power warfare except after the opposing major power has been strategically crippled and blinded.


9 posted on 12/27/2010 12:38:24 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana
Please. This administration wouldn't use nukes if the whole of New York was vaporized.

Besides, at the rate the Obama administration is cutting out military, it won't be long before China won't have any use for these missiles.

10 posted on 12/27/2010 12:38:32 PM PST by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wonder what Clinton’s price was for selling out our country?


11 posted on 12/27/2010 12:38:36 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vortigern

“Bought and paid for by our debt to China. “

Yep, that we would ever seriously stand up to China is crazy..between debt we owe and manufacturing we have moved there.


12 posted on 12/27/2010 12:38:43 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Quix; aragorn; null and void; houeto
Here's that Asian/Attack/Ship(stripe) Lookingglass hit again.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

13 posted on 12/27/2010 12:39:42 PM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Lest we ever forget. The SLIME that was the Clinton Administration.


14 posted on 12/27/2010 12:40:21 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Why do we have trade relations with a country that considers us their enemy?

If the French or British ever made weapons specifically designed for us how would we react to it?

15 posted on 12/27/2010 12:40:26 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
China's testing has not gone as far as a live-fire test

Something this new and it hasn't had a live fire test. Hardly operational. When dealing with something as complex as a missile simulations will only get you so far. And you don't want to be shooting a prototype at something that is likely to be shooting back if your missile is a dud.

Also could the SM-3 ABM be used against these things?
16 posted on 12/27/2010 12:40:58 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

What about boomers?


17 posted on 12/27/2010 12:41:10 PM PST by RexBeach ("There is no such thing as a good tax." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel

If this “administration” failed to respond, it would be rather quickly replaced.

Obama cannot do everything he would like to do to sell us out.


18 posted on 12/27/2010 12:43:08 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

An interesting thing about trying to hit an aircraft carrier”

Obviously, in order to hit the carrier, you must know exactly where it is. If it’s 200 miles out, how do you get a radar fist and, more importantly, of the 30 odd ships out there, which one is the aircraft carrier?

For over 30 years, the ships in the aircraft carrier group have had the capability to mess with radar signals to make it appear that something else is the carrier. I knew some midshipmen who bragged about these technologies over 30 years ago. I can’t help that believe that, in the interim, these capabilities have been dramatically improved.


19 posted on 12/27/2010 12:45:18 PM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Where oh where would the Chicoms get this missile technology :(


20 posted on 12/27/2010 12:45:24 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson