Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Come now...the ancient Greeks were technologically advanced enough to have a medium for writing that didn’t require them to haul around two ton stone calendars. Clay tablets were in use thousands of years before the Greeks.

The “Olympic calendar” hypothesis isn’t holding up to simple logic.


80 posted on 12/22/2010 7:43:50 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
What you fail to comprehend is that if you'd read even the Wiki article you'd find references to the fact it does track the Olympic dates ~ and there are a lot of them.

It was designed to be portable.

It's no more complex than clocks of the 14th or 15th century.

81 posted on 12/22/2010 7:52:12 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

BTW, in the period when the machine was built the Romans (and their satrapies) did not yet use a leap year in their calender, and unless you account for the 1/4 year drift each year you end up with your calendar out of synch. The machine accounted for that 1/4 year problem.


106 posted on 12/23/2010 7:38:38 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson