Posted on 12/20/2010 4:22:05 AM PST by Carbonsteel
You’re babbling nonsense.
The Supreme Court that decided this issue in 1899 was entirely appointed by Republicans, and they found against your reading. “Not under the jurisdiction of the US” means diplomats’ kids under immunity and nobody else.
You’re wanting A to read B because you like B better. A is correct.
You simply can’t admit the possibility that I know what I’m talking about....
Uh, I’ve pretty much moved on from this discussion. I’ve had dozens like it. It may be new and exciting for you but for me it’s boring and repetitive. You are not unique. Wannabe gadflys are all alike.
Ask yourself this:
1 )What are you trying to accomplish with your posts?
2 )What are the odds you will accomplish your goal using your current approach?
3) What changes to your approach can you make to be happier and more productive?
I asked you a question, not them. Do you know enough about what you are talking about to form and express a cogent answer to that question, in your own words?
Good luck on that one. No direct answers to direct questions from that one so far...
How did "being under the jurisdiction" of the US become a grant of citizenship?
Just wow.
There is not one comment at that site supportive of Senor Perez. He should have written his article in Spanish, I guess!
They won’t do anything....they are pure cowards.
1 )What are you trying to accomplish with your posts?
Trying to communicate to readers to beware of individuals who think that one fine day that there’ll be “duck season” for eeeleguls. I hope that it is seen that maybe that’s not an approach that will either work or win elections.
2 )What are the odds you will accomplish your goal using your current approach?
A lot greater than if I simply quack like all the other ducks in the pond.
3) What changes to your approach can you make to be happier and more productive?
That’s not a criterion. I’m not here to be happier, I’m here to communicate certain essential information that needs to be heard even if it won’t be heard by those who are responding on this thread.
I don’t expect to convert anybody who thinks that they’re a “sovereign citizen,” or who wants to round up all the illegals and throw them in jail, or who thinks that America = an America hostile to blacks, Hispanics or anyone else, or that the Constitution ceased to be worth anything after 1865.
I do expect that there are readers of this thread who might find a new approach to a problem that usually only gets mindless duckspeak responses around here.
“THEY’RE ALL CRIMINALS! THROW THEM ALL OUT!” is not an answer. I’m offering a plan B. *YOU* may not like the plan B but that’s not my problem.
Since I have not offered any of the positions you seem to find objectionable, why do you keep preaching to me?
You’re shooting the messenger as regards the use and abuse of Jim Robinson’s forum and I’m tired of it. At this point a zot in your future would make my life less tedious.
Good bye.
Post to me no more.
Youre shooting the messenger as regards the use and abuse of Jim Robinsons forum>>>
So you get to decide who is a heretic (by Jim Robinson’s standards) and who isn’t? Sorry, I didn’t see the badge....
No, I have no power here. Believe it or not I was trying to be helpful.
I suggest you run some of your n00b ideas past Jim Robinson himself and tell him just how wrong we are not to accept those who don't think and speak as we do, that we are wrong not to debate your pointless liberal gibberish all day, and that since anchor babies have been the law for decades that is the last word on the issue. I'm sure you have a few more talking points to throw in there, too.
Jim has provided a clarification on the gay agenda recently, if he's not busy maybe he can clarify FR's position on illegal aliens.
I've already posted his own words that we are not a debating society but you wouldn't listen...
zot
Bigot.
Here’s the rule: If you support open borders, amnesty, illegal aliens, the dream act, etc, you are an UnAmerican leftist idiot and get the zot.
Retaining your culture and country is a LOT MORE important than making sure there’s plenty of warm bodies available to buy iPods.
I give him a week at best. The Zot is inevitable. He already blew his cover.
Yep.
Ghotier room!
___________________
:) I could see the melt down coming. It’s hard for a liberal to hold it in for too long. He really exposed himself in 2001 but for some reason coasted along for 9 years. I could tell he was ready to bust out and he did. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.