Posted on 12/19/2010 2:31:41 AM PST by RobinMasters
It just doesn't appear to be going away.
The idea that Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, and do chores such as appointing Supreme Court justices, needs to be explored and documented is headed back to the highest court in the land.
According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.
This particular case has had a long proceeding; it began as a challenge to the legality of the military orders under Obama, whose eligibility to hold the office of president never has been documented to date. While that officer, Capt. Connie Rhodes, ultimately followed her orders, the attorney was fined $20,000 in the case, and it continued its path through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and now is pending in Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I thought I read that it was Pelosi who certified Obummer. In 2012 we will have our guy in her place so he will have the obligation to check out the REAL birth certificate.
Before you get your hopes up remember that picture of Obama schmoozing the SCOTUS? Chicago style folks, Chicago Style.
If I am not mistaken, at this point this is about the $20k that nutcase Orly Taitz was ordered to pay, and doesn’t have a darn thing to do with Obama.
The EO in question which will continue unless changed by another President:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrderPresidentialRecords
The history of the EOs on Presidential Records begins when President Reagan signed the first EO 12667, Jan. 18, 1989. The EO continues unless changed by an EO.
On January 21, 2009, Executive Order 13233 [GW Bush EO] was revoked by executive order of President Barack Obama. Obama essentially restored the wording of Executive Order 12667 [Reagan’s EO], by repeating most of the text of that order with minor changes. One notable change is that vice presidential records are explicitly covered by his new order. From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13233
The Presidential Records Act only covers items associated with the presidential term and not the life history or that’s how I understand it.
You are absolutely correct, but WND will never let facts get in the way of birther website hits.
If I am not mistaken, at this point this is about the $20k that nutcase Orly Taitz was ordered to pay, and doesn’t have a darn thing to do with Obama.
She doesn’t even have a client at this stage as Capt. Rhodes fired her. So I think it’s about the $20,000 she had to cough up as you state. I suspect it won’t get a review as it’s already been through one review and upheld.
To retroactively diqualify the Obama administration at this point in time might cause the U.S. government to collapse.”””
That is what a Vice President is for & a legal succession system which this country has in place.
“will every appointment he made be null & void?”
Yes, and also every law and treaty he signed.”
Also every Executive Order.
He gets 400K a year, so if only one term, then he doesn’t get 4 years of salary.
I don’t understand what you are saying.
If Obama were somehow removed from office, all of the laws, acts, orders, etc signed by him would remain as law under the de facto officer doctrine.”
I think that would be heavily argued.
NObama was not eligible in the first place & HE knew it. I think that Howard Dean & others also knew it, but covered it up.
That makes NObama nothing more than a forger & fraud.
If someone improperly signs checks in my business, they are not legal & I can recover against those actions.
I think that since he was NEVER eligible in the first place, that each & every law,bill, treaty & Executive Order & appointment would be null & void. He had no legal authority to sign anything from the first minuts.
Executive Orders remain in effect until rescinded, by the the issuing president or a subsequent president.
Out of curiosity, what is the number of the Executive Order blocking those documents? I'd like to read that one.
The DNC was responsible for qualifying NObama in the first place. I think Howard Dean knows he is fraud.
Yes, and also every law and treaty he signed.”
So let me get this straight...
Democrats have been trying to pass health care legislation since before Obama was born. Hillary (the First Lady at the time, an unelected position) was the last to try to get it passed.
Congress, the elected representatives of the people, crafted the legislation, and then voted on it.
So after all the years of work on the legislation by hundreds of Democrat legislators and their staff, Obama places his signature on it.
And you seriously believe that either the Legislative or Judicial branch will completely ignore the fact that it was agreed to by a majority of the peoples representatives, and declare it null and void because a handful of conspiracy theorists "raise questions" about the birth certificate of the guy who only signed the bill?
Yes.
The usual suspects - Mikulski, Collins, Snowe et al.
More bastards.
I suspect the Supremes are shy of this one, and that they would prefer to drag the issue out until after Bam Bam and the wookie are out of the WH.
Good enough. It will strip him of his pension and other perks.
I remember reading that a few states were working on such legislation. Here is an article about the states that were planning to pass legislation....but I do not know if any states have such laws in place to require documentary proof of citizenship for candidates to be placed on the ballot.
http://www.desertconservative.com/2010/11/20/obama-time-to-pony-up-or-cut-out/
The United States of America was a Constitutional Republic.
It no longer exists because it must have a Constitutionally
elected President .
America ceased to exist in January 2009 when a foreign national seized control of the our nation by fraud.
Georgia is also pursuing it (as well as Arizona style immigration laws; we already have a voter ID law in place which was previously being challeneged by Eric Holder but recently dropped). Our newly elected Gov. Nathan Deal (which was my rep in the House) has publicly requested Obama to present his birth credentials for public viewing. He was immediatelt slimed with claims of ethics violations by his political opponents leading up to his win for the governorship.I suspect he would gladly sign anything that demands proof of eligibility to hold the highest office in the land.
If he is legal, it would take mere seconds to prove it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEhGeenOltk&feature=player_embedded
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.