Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
I'd wear that badge with pride my self ;)
I also don't care too much for those who have gone unnamed. Those who don't hold the virtues or want to turn FR into a debating society. Black is black. White is white. There is no failure of clarity and if you don't believe in something, get out but if you believe in something, you don't let others chase you off.
What you’re doing isn’t about beliefs. It’s about insulting people that you don’t care for. There’s no honor or gain in that. And if the owner objects to what someone is doing, he isn’t shy about telling them.
You are no Conservative.
I hear some gerbils scream, others get zotted.
Didn't you know? Moses actually brought down three tablets. There were 15 Commandments:
11. If it feels good, it isn't sinful.
12. God loves you and won't hold anything against you.
13. If you think good thoughts, you'll go to Heaven.
14. You can't be immoral because God created you in His image.
15. God's plan for your life is whatever you decide.
(Do I really need a sarc tag?)
You're right about the gain but to say nothing about the situation is not honorable either.
16. No in the butt.
As to the "lifestyle" at issue there are two different elements: identity and behavior. They are not the same thing. Homosexuals do not choose their identity. Years of empirical evidence can attest to that fact: it just happens, for whatever reason(s). As to behavior: that is very much a choice, and it involves a range of possible interactions, some far safer than others.
Well that about seals the deal for me. On one hand we see "years of empirical evidence" and on the other we see God. You speak empirical evidence...
You do realize that the unproven state of being termed "homosexual" is arbitrary and a self declared matter of perception e.g. mental in nature? Until recently mental conditions that were self destructive and deviant from the norm were termed mental disorders THAT IS until politics coerced science. What makes you think your "Years of empirical evidence" has not been coerced the same way climate data or any number of data has been manipulated.
Anyway, regardless debating what the causes of disorder are I tend to focus on opposing the agenda that seeks to normalize it, the agenda that seeks to gain its acceptance, and the agenda that promotes it as worthy of societal value.
IF your "Years of empirical evidence" is proffered to gain acceptance and approval of or defend "private, non-violent, sexual behavior" THEN I would suggest that we do not even remotely discuss that here -THAT has nothing at all to do with opposing the homosexual agenda. In essence, you fight the good fight in a battle that is not even being waged here.
YOU sure quack like a duck, are well versed in pond swimming and have wings at the ready e.g. "Years of empirical evidence" to flap when necessary. IF you are not promoting the homosexual agenda then what exactly are you doing?
No. LOL
Jim is aware of what goes on here on FR. If he wants something changed, he’ll see to it. All you’ll do is make enemies and maybe get a short ride on a lightning bolt.
I’M WONDERING WHY YOU THREATENED ME WITH THIS...
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you’ll get the zot from FR!
IF YOU READ MY POST, I MOST CERTAINLY DID NOT MAKE A PITCH FOR GAY MARRIAGE—I MADE JUST THE OPPOSITE. I STATED THAT GAY MARRIAGE IS NOT THE ANSWER TO INHERITANCE LAW DISCREPANCIES.
PLEASE READ A PERSON’S POST BEFORE YOU THREATEN HIM!
Correct.
How'd he taste?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.