Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
You listed the “only” problems you had with the homosexual agenda. Nowhere did you mention their takeover of the schools, and “gay adoption”.
Time to change my tagline.
The subversion of the Church and the undermining of its doctrines by the sodomist movement is real, ongoing and, for the most part, uncontested. It needs to be stopped here and now and if not totally eradicated, at least pushed back into its creepy historical closet. Coexistence with the sodomist movement is impossible for the Church.
If you want to read a scholarly, detailed and lengthy book about the historical and present day's insidious sodomist attack on the Church, read: "The Rite of Sodomy" by Randy Engel. It is an eye-opener, and the infiltration has been going on for hundreds of years.
Sodomy Brigades,Deviant Divisions,Prancing Platoons,Odd Squads,Flakey Fleets,Squalid Squadrons—the possibilities are horrendous.
I don't believe there was a zot, just a reprimand. You can find the information here.
“The way I understood it was if they wanted to fight and kill the enemy, they could. It is they recreational activities that they could not openly practice.”
That was my understanding, as well.
“Personally, I’d whack you just for your handle alone.”
That there is why I love your postings...even as ornery as you can be at times. ;o)
Yes...you did make the connection between JR and Phelps. Maybe you did so in a heated moment. We’ve all had those.
I hope you will apologize to him.
I don’t think as much about the constitution in military matters...the military is not a democracy nor is it a republic...as much as I think about the cohesiveness of each unit, especially during wartime. I’ve never served, but my husband did. He doesn’t think it’s a good idea.
LOL! You are still on board here, and I’m happy to ‘see’ you. ;o)
“I don’t consider the military to be normal “society”, so I believe they should be allowed to have their own set of rules that can deviate a little from what normal society might have. I thought DADT was a pretty good compromise actually.”
You are exactly right on the military’s role in society...it should have none, except to defend this country. Without rules...cohesiveness...order...they are not as effective as they need to be. DADT was a great compromise, allowing gays to serve without effecting military cohesiveness.
I c/p that part of your post, however I agree with every word you wrote.
A clear insult, I get it.
If you want childish behavior go over to the DU where you'll fit right in.
Actually, manc, you clarified very clearly how destructive homosexual activity is in the military, especially the tent dwellers.
By the way, BG&Rusty, let me correct your tag typo:
Big Guy and Rusty 99 (I am defiant.)
Big Guy and Rusty 99 (I am deviant.)
Hey Jim,
Your stance is absolutely sensible, because we have all seen how the Left have been chip-chip-chipping away at conservative values pretty much since the Berlin Wall fell. It’s important that we push back.
The leftists foolishly thought they’d be able to “turn” the right wingers into leftists through reasoned debate and sufficient browbeating, which is where the criticism of FR often comes that this is a “closed shop” and their discussion boards aren’t - but more and more, now, I’m seeing people who were dyed-in-the-wool leftists a few years ago, taking conservative arguments on board in the first instance, and a few months later making those same arguments themselves. All because they’ve opened themselves up for us to chip away at them.
Where I now live, in rural Yorkshire, you can really see the difference conservatives have made in the past few years by getting out of our bunkers and confronting the leftists head-on in the territories they regard as their own:
1. The Labour MP was shown the door in the summer and we elected a conservative from the village, to replace him
2. The school is now C of E funded with a conservative headmistress, pupil numbers are on the increase, SATs results are up
3. Since the summer my wife has been running a Sunday school, with 20 kids attending to date. This has been so successful that the church now runs a monthly service where the children are involved in choosing the hymns and doing the readings, and the church is completely packed out on those days. Ten years ago, apparently, you could count the number of regular churchgoers under retirement age, on the fingers of one hand.
4. We’ve had at least twenty business startups in the village in the past three years and over 100 people gone self-employed. Most recently, we’ve built our own independent, community-run broadband enterprise (with private money), and we’re separately piloting a wireless mesh allowing people to access local government, education and health services.
5. The village white elephant - a fire station built in the mid 80s solely to ensure that “scab” houses could be doused down (yes, you’d have your house razed to the ground for supporting Thatcher, THAT’S how Marxist it used to be round here!) - has been transformed into a community center offering retraining courses with private funding.
6. Since we’ve achieved more than the leftists ever did, the top hate figure in the pub these days, isn’t Thatcher anymore... it’s the communist union autocrat Arthur Scargill who called the miners out, and his Labour Party buddies who lied to the miners again and again, saying “the Tories hate you, but we are here to help”.
By American standards I expect this is all baby steps and we’ve got an awful long way to go, but considering the position we started from, things are definitely moving in the right direction.
If somewhere as historically pro-union, pro-state and pro-handouts as this can have a conservative reawakening, then it can happen anywhere. It just takes time, patience, ACTIVISM, and above all, the bottle to seek out and demolish the left wing arguments instead of just sitting in a conservative bunker preaching to the already converted.
If we let them bring their arguments to our table, it’ll break the momentum of the grass roots efforts on both sides of the Atlantic, and that’s why you don’t want to do that here.
It seems you've learned very little. The nexus of the discussion is DADT, a military issue. My guess whether your friends are flaming fairies is of no concern to most everyone here. Get real. The drama....
But that didn't stop you from turning into a, how did you put it? Ah yes, a 'queer bait thread'. Much to your delight. Well, everyone needs a hobby I guess.
Maybe while your busy with all that noticing, you could pay attention who actually says what. You could use some work in that area.
Still waiting for the post where I supported debauchery
or
An apology.
Sure go ahead, this is a zot thread, maybe something good can come of this. Come into the light Non-sequitur......
So what did you mean by the Lord of the Flies Comment?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.