If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!

Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

[trisham]

Do you truly believe that their nature and behavior make them non-human?

*************************************

Is that what he said? Because I thought he said this:

" No, they willingly act* like barnyard animals"

Misconstruing another member's post is deception.

.

.

.

*emphasis is mine.

[GenY Republican]

Standards of what is wrong change.

[Jim Robinson]

Homosexualism is a word that describes the leftist perverted homosexual political movement. Homosexualism is not a civil right, it’s a perversion. I will have conservatives on FR. Liberalism is not practiced here. Sorry to see you go, but go you will if you preach the liberal lie.

[FlyingEagle]

The homosexual agenda and lifestyle killed my brother from Aids. This is a matter of life and death, not free expression. Spiritual law and natural law trump perversion.

[who knows what evil?]

Okay. Enjoy the skittles and unicorns...the conservatives will keep packing.

[bcsco]

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!

Works for me. Except, I recall using Shinola as a kid. I guess that makes me one of those who COULD tell the s___ from Sninola...

[Big Guy and Rusty 99]

I am basing this on THE CONSTITUTION. There is nothing in THE CONSTITUTION to support a ban of homosexuals in the military. Furthermore, the 14th amendment affords equal protection to ALL.

[GenY Republican]

What I said in the previous post about standards changing. His rationale that Homosexuality is not a peversion is ridicalous because one can argue the same thing for incest. Some things are just not ethical at all.

Homosexuality just weakens the social structure of the country, leading us to being more alienated from each other.

[central_va]

survived Hill 937 Dickweed!

God bless you and all that were there. Thank you. Sorry you have to debate with these dweebs. Makes me f-ing sick.

[library user]

Perhaps you are right. Perhaps we should round all homosexuals up and stick them in gas ovens.

Stop with the hyperbole. Jim specifically said "If you support the homosexual agenda...."

Newspapers all across the country are flat-out LYING about DADT.

For example, the front page of my paper (the Toledo Blade) has this headline today:

Senate Ends Military's Ban On Gays

Oh, really?

So if you're gay you haven't been able to serve in the military the past 17 years?

That's what the headline implies and it's a lie.

BOTTOM LINE: We need a new media. And anyone here who thinks FNC is "new media" and is doing more help (vs. harm) to conservatives is being fooled, but it's not surprising.

Increasingly, FNC's guests and their commentary is aligning more and more to what you'd except from CNN and MSNBC.

FNC was decent up until 2004 or so, but currently the only show I can stomach on that network is Glenn Beck.

[Repeal The 17th]

"..There is a HUGE difference between incest and homosexuality..."
-

So what is your position on sheep-buggering?
And please don't tell us it is your back against the wall
and your legs spread slightly apart.

[Mago]

I may not personally support the “agenda” you speak of, and the 2nd coming of the Clinton administration (Obama, obviously) makes me sick. But I’m sorry, many of you sound very unchristian with your hateful comments in this very bizarre thread.

Jim, yours are maybe the strongest and sadly I can’t and won’t associate with the site anymore. My father taught me to do the right thing, even if it was difficult and even if it would cause some grief. So I’m going to do the right thing.

And I imagine I’ll get the usual pre-and-post-ZOT comments, but that’s part of the price.

Thanks for the memories. I’ve been a member nearly ten years and lurked before, pretty much since the start. So I’ll miss the ability to post occasionally. Thanks for your representation against real evil—the Clintons—when we needed it most, and I wish you all the best.

You've summed up exactly how I feel.

I've seen a different side of FR today that somehow I missed before and I just cannot be a part of it. It is time for me to leave the forum.

No ill will toward anyone, always stand up for what you believe is just.

[GenY Republican]

When those guys wrote that amendment after the civil war, I don’t think they were considering deviant indivduals of all kinds to be in there.

[Jim Robinson]

Bye.

[FlyingEagle]

“Truth. What is Truth?”

[going hot]

On one side, stands the typical sf liberal, all accepting of the perversion.

On the other side, there stands the 100%, shoot on site and let them rot in the gutter, no prisoners.

I suspect most here, including myself, are more to the right, although I suspect less, including myself, are all the way there. So, there in fact is a grey zone.

Rush (pulling the lib chain) says the rich are every one that makes one dollar more than them.In the same vein, anyone that is ever so slightly to the left of total shot on sight, is not necessarily in the camp of total acceptence.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

There is where you screwed up Hot Dog.

There is absolutely NOTHING in the Constitution that grants special rights or treatment, based on Sexual orientation.

It is basically just a perversion, not a birth right. The Supreme court cannot rule or change the Constitution, but they did attempt to interpret that somewhere, there has to be the term “Sexual Orientation” in there that imposes a right or, directly relates it to race or national orientation somehow.

Of course, we all know that this complete BS. Except maybe you.

[central_va]

Furthermore, the 14th amendment affords equal protection to ALL.

Let me fill you in, you give up your Constitutional rights when you are sworn into the military. People that can be ordered to go on virtual suicides missions can't have rights. Get it. The have the right to say aye aye and go up the hill.

[Husker8877]

Thanks again.

Mark

[don-o]

My name is don-o

I approve that post.