Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldGoatCPO

Answer a question for me, if a gay person goes to battle for this country and dies in the process, is his sacrifice less than a heterosexuals?


210 posted on 12/18/2010 10:53:21 AM PST by ShandaLear (Where on Earth is Barack Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: ShandaLear

first off they are homosexuals not gay unless you lie playing the lefts word game.
Secondly they should not bee there in the first place as most of us do not want them. I say we as those who are serving or have served.
Thirdly with all their diseases they have form their sick sex then do you think I or others would be wanting to touch their blood knowing that they might have a disease which can be given to me and cause me death later on.

Manning is a perfect example of why homosexuals should not be there.
They care about letting people know what turns them off and gets them off more than anything else
Look at the homosexuals at the white house chaining themselves up.
Where were they with cuts tot he military?
why did they now demonstrate those cuts which costs lives?

I’ll answer for you because they care about their homosexual agenda and another thing I will say to you.
Jim R has made it perfectly clear time and time again that this site is a conservative site which is not for the homosexual agenda.


219 posted on 12/18/2010 10:59:22 AM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: ShandaLear

How can a military that is so stymied by political correctness that nobody will report a guy who’s BUSINESS CARD says he’s a jihadist until he shoots up Ft.Hood possibly be trusted to fairly enforce rules of conduct on another ‘favored and protected’ group?


228 posted on 12/18/2010 11:04:06 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: ShandaLear
“Answer a question for me, if a gay person goes to battle for this country and dies in the process, is his sacrifice less than a heterosexuals?”

Of course not..that is never been an issue except maybe to people who like you that are clueless. Gays already serve, honorably. DADT means they do not sit around and discuss buggery and how they buggered their boyfriend last night! Much like I do not discuss what my position from the Kama sutra my wife and I prefer.

We discharge senior enlisted and force Officers to resign for having sex with Juniors. That is forbidding under the UCMJ, as is sex in the barracks (generally by local orders) and sodomy and theft and polygamy and...need I say more. These laws are there for good order and discipline in the military. Military members live under laws far more restrictive than civilians, we all give up some rights in order to serve. Gays included. DADT allowed those gays willing to serve under the UCMJ the ability to serve.

Service in the military is NOT a right. Fat people cannot serve, people treated with mood altering drugs for any disorder may not be allowed to serve. Handicapped people cannot join nor can felons or know gang members.

NOBODY is kicked out for being gay, they are kicked out for perform gay acts or admitting to them in violation of the UCMJ. If gay acts are performed in the privacy of their own home or a motel it is rarely reported and is generally of no concern. On base or post that is a different subject. You really must stop lecturing someone who has served has gone to war and has seen over 30 years of social experiments in the military not all good. DADT limited the number of homosexuals to only those willing to remain circumspect and follow the rules.

261 posted on 12/18/2010 11:19:47 AM PST by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: ShandaLear

Given the current situation with our military fighting in countries where homosexuality is a crime punishable by death, who will take up the slack when openly gay military cannot go to the battlefield?

How fair will that be?

I was one of those who thought this whole DADT thing was innocuous, like a mosquito bite, but it isn’t. It opens the door to other things, and this whole business is nothing more than forcing the rest of this nation to accept homosexuality as normal.

And by forcing, we’re talking with the force of law. Say what you will, but I’ve not heard of a case in this country where someone went to jail because they refused to accept Christianity.

This is NOT going to end well.


281 posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:08 AM PST by kozanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: ShandaLear

[Answer a question for me, if a gay person goes to battle for this country and dies in the process, is his sacrifice less than a heterosexuals?]

No, but when half a platoon is gay and the hetero half is descriminated against by the leader, and it is time to go into battle and one half of the platoon gets fragged by the other half, then the sacrifice for the homos has been devastating. You have no idea what harm this will cause.


302 posted on 12/18/2010 11:52:48 AM PST by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson