Posted on 12/18/2010 8:01:19 AM PST by IbJensen
15. How different is being a prostitute from being a stripper, massage therapist, or a nurse?
OK, now you've opened up the bad humor floodgates...
Q. Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
A. The Rooster.
Q. Isn't there something wrong when the Spanish translation of the Perdue "It takes a hard man to get a chicken aroused" ?
You must be the type who goes scoping for chicks because you just want cheep sex.
And don't even get me started about the pornographic picture on the Corn Flakes box...
Cheers!
I don’t know. Might be too tough for Laz.
What? Starts out with porn and then goes to hookers? poorly designed “quiz”.
So you approve of the Columbia University poli-sci prof who's banging his daughter?
Or are you ready to move to Switzerland once they rescind their anti-incest laws?
Or do you, like Peter Singer of Princeton, approve of bestiality?
Stay away from my cat!
Sounds like you do *that* all the time: which explains why your love life is pretty much "Han Solo"...
Cheers!
Oooh, big words mr junior high. Too bad your still wrong. It is kind of funny that you are now changing your original analogy. Have fun being righteous.
...I'm told one of the main fetishes (besides French Maids and Litte-Bo-Peep outfits) is Nurse Uniforms.
Some people need a life...maybe then they could land a wife. Or vice-versa.
Cheers!
I really don't care if it is “oky doky” with you or other Christians or not. It's none of your business. Just like it's none of your business how many guns I have or what I read or what groups I associate with.
And before the attack begins, no, I don't watch or look at porn. But I do own many guns and will associate with who I choose.
...I'm told one of the main fetishes (besides French Maids and Little-Bo-Peep outfits) is Nurse Uniforms.
Some people need a life...maybe then they could land a wife. Or vice-versa.
Cheers!
IF two adults want to do something together, what business is it of mine. As far as I know, animals cant give consent.
boys will be boys, eh?
I temper my social conservatism with the Oath I took to uphold and defend our nation's Founding Documents, and the freedom enshrined therein.
hmmm...
I think that would be
Mrs. Junior High, to you
Where would you believe the fight best fought? Do you believe that girls are too weak to say no?
I think boys are too weak to say no. Young women are easy on the eyes.
As a sixty-five years old grandfather, I’m wondering if you were just trying to be insulting and cannot carry it off?
Visual Presentations of Male Surface Anatomy cause
... No response ... in Women
Uh, no. I’m female and visualizing “Male Surface Anatomy” definitely produces a reaction in me. That said, I never use porn because it is an exploitative industry and contributes to seeing BOTH sexes as either sex objects or mere consumers of sex, not as human beings.
“I guess some social conservatives will have to choose between the Constitution and morality, not an easy one.
I know one who would say that “porn” leads to marxism. So does throwing out the right to free speech.
In the Citizens United case, a movie was considered free speech. I know what I would choose.”
Actually, there is no conflict. The USSC has already ruled speech that is harmful may be prohibited; yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater. Porn is always harmful—to participants and viewers, and the viewers’ families and the participants’ families. I prefer the ability of local communities and states to forbid it—or permit it. This ought to be a states’ rights issue, not a federal issue. All such crime is at a state and local level.
It does not surprise me though that so many of the childish posters have no idea who Chessler really is, what she fights for or how much they (should) have in common with her.
How do you explain all the centuries when porn was so effectively prevented and limited by the colonists, and then the American people?
I don’t think that your pro-porn arguments would have carried much water in 1800.
Your arguments are the 1960s, and 1970s, arguments of the left, that the Constitution allows everything, and that the first 200 years was illegal repression of freedom by Christian America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.