Posted on 12/16/2010 3:49:01 PM PST by FS11
But Lakin said Wednesday that despite his questions about Obama's eligibility for office, he was wrong not to follow Army orders. He acknowledged that the Army was the wrong place to raise his concerns about Obama, asked to keep his job and said he was now willing to deploy.
"I don't want it to end this way," Lakin told the jury Wednesday under questioning from his lawyer. "I want to continue to serve."
(Excerpt) Read more at aolnews.com ...
This is the only case where someones career is going up in smoke for challenging Obamas eligibility
So I guess we could say the brave soldier has STANDING, that nebulous quality that eluded all of the other plaintiffs.
When it is shown he is right, what then???
37 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:34:36 PM by Cheetahcat
38 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:35:30 PM by CynicalBear
Are you not aware that Lakin himself said he was wrong repeatedly in court when he pled guilty. I, personally, think he is was right to question BO’s illegitimate pResidency. It is a pity that Lakin and others think he was wrong.
When it is shown he is right, what then???
37 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:34:36 PM by Cheetahcat
38 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:35:30 PM by CynicalBear
Are you not aware that Lakin himself said he was wrong repeatedly in court when he pled guilty. I, personally, think he is was right to question BOs illegitimate pResidency. It is a pity that Lakin and others think he was wrong.
This is the only case where someones career is going up in smoke for challenging Obamas eligibility
So I guess we could say the brave soldier has STANDING, that nebulous quality that eluded all of the other plaintiffs.
41 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:44:43 PM by Josephat
He pled guilty and the issue of BO’s illegitimat pResidency was never heard at his trial and consequently he has to standing to file any legal action against BO.
>>Are you not aware that Lakin himself said he was wrong repeatedly in court when he pled guilty.<<
Yeah, he caved and tried to save his benefits.
This is the only case where someones career is going up in smoke for challenging Obamas eligibility
So I guess we could say the brave soldier has STANDING, that nebulous quality that eluded all of the other plaintiffs.
41 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:44:43 PM by Josephat
He pled guilty and the issue of BOs illegitimat pResidency was never heard at his trial and consequently he has NO standing to file any legal action against BO.
Yeah, he caved and tried to save his benefits.
45 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:56:26 PM by CynicalBear
Yes he made a big mistake, pleading guilty without a plea agreement for no prison time. By pleading guilty without a plea bargain, he lost his benefits and got prison time. He gained nothing by pleading guilty.
When it is shown he is right, what then???
37 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:34:36 PM by Cheetahcat
“Yet I would bet that every person who says that Lakin was wrong...
38 posted on Thursday, December 16, 2010 7:35:30 PM by CynicalBear
Are you not aware that Lakin himself said he was wrong repeatedly in court when he pled guilty. I, personally, think he is was right to question BOs illegitimate pResidency. It is a pity that Lakin and others think he was wrong.”
Yes I saw that but he like most of America believed Obama is a foreigner.
Poor guy.
Satan is laughing.
C’mon God. swoop down now. Do something for the good side.
Nothing good will come from Lakin’s guilty pleas.
“He has become a true political victim.”
I consider him a volunteer, not a victim.
He’s now a martyr to a few, and a fool to many.
Once again Lakin’s trial has resulted, I believe, in more accurate reporting by AOL of who are now reporting what HI and “birthers” said without any framing that what HI said “debunked” anything or any reference to “nonpartisan Factcheck.”
AOL makes clear that the HI computer “certification” is _not_ an original 1961 BC. IMO, AOL is inviting fair-minded readers to ask the same questions that Lakin and “birthers” are asking.
Thank you LTC Lakin!
We shall see.
I think you are missing the distinction between what Col. Lakin’s court martial was about, what he pleaded guilty to, and the eligibility issue.
Would you like to share with your fellow FReepers your personal experience(s) in taking a principled stand that cost you your long, honorable military (or other) career with its benefits, and your willingness to do time for it? If not, I suggest you not so quickly toss Col. Lakin aside as someone who ‘caved.’
bttt
Lakin capitulated his brief “principled” stand when he said was wrong repeatedly in court and pled guilty.
I, personally, think he is was right to question BOs illegitimate pResidency. It is a pity that Lakin himself thinks he was wrong to make his brief “principled” stand.
It is sad that Lakin was so afraid of doing jail time and losing his benefits that he capitulated his brief “principled” stand and pled guilty, thus ensuring that he would get jail time and lose his benefits. It is sad that Lakin was so overcome with fear that he listened to the very bad advice of his lawyer, but Lakin alone sealed his fate.
Its hard to produce something that does not exist.
Yep. And now the cowards and shills and RINOs will slink out and howl against his character, dismiss the crushing pressure he was put under, and ignore a military record he earned that they couldn't achieve in their dreams - all while waving the flag and spitting at his courage and honor.
It's revolting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.