Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Behind Bill Clinton's Smile
Townhall.com ^ | December 15, 2010 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 12/15/2010 4:48:54 AM PST by Kaslin

You've got to give Barack Obama credit. His learning curve gets steeper and steeper, but he continues to climb.

"I'm going to let him speak very briefly," Obama said Friday before making the fateful decision to allow a smirking Bill Clinton a none-too-brief moment in front of the cameras. It was the sort of famous blunder that comes after getting into a land war in Southeast Asia or getting into a contest with a Sicilian when death is on the line.

He might as well have said, "I'm going to let this grizzly bear have just one lick of my ice cream cone."

Still, that Clinton is a camera hog, or even that he puts the lie to Obama's reputation as the most eloquent Democrat, are easy lessons to learn compared with accepting the need to embrace George W. Bush's tax cuts and ask Clinton for help selling the decision.

You have to think Obama is wondering where he took a wrong turn.

The obvious answer: his stimulus bill, which is so unpopular now that Bill Clinton joked on Friday, "I guess we're not supposed to use that word anymore."

But that's not how it was when Obama took office with an approval rating near 70 percent (83 percent of Americans approved of his transition efforts). Contrary to the spin, many congressional Republicans were either eager to work with the new president or terrified of opposing him. They weren't opposed to a stimulus bill either.

But the White House decided to sign on to the pork-heavy stimulus crafted by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, without GOP input -- "We won the election. We wrote the bill," Pelosi boasted -- thus blowing up Obama's still-plausible image as a bipartisan president and emboldening the Republicans to oppose the stimulus, which also left them free to run against the sinking "Obama economy."

The Republicans discovered that opposing Obama's partisan agenda was good politics. By the health-care debate, independents flocked to the GOP, delivering electoral victories throughout 2009, and delivering a House majority last month. That new reality is why we got the Clinton rerun Friday.

But what if Obama had gone another way? What if he had rejected both the Democratic and the Republican stimulus bills and gone for a one-year payroll tax holiday of some kind, as many economists suggested at the time?

No bells, no whistles. No too-clever-by-half tax credits or subsidies. Just a straightforward suspension of some or all of the roughly $625 billion the government collects in payroll taxes. A 50 percent cut in the payroll tax, economist Lawrence B. Lindsey estimated during the stimulus debate, would have put $1,500 in the pocket of the typical worker making $50,000 a year. And it would have made hiring or keeping workers less expensive for employers.

After all, if you want more of something, tax it less. If you want less of something, tax it more.

Such a stimulus would have been very progressive because payroll taxes are decidedly regressive, hitting the working and middle class harder than they hit the wealthy. According to American Enterprise Institute economist John Makin, payroll taxes amount to the primary taxes paid by the 60 percent of Americans who shell out comparatively little or nothing in federal income tax.

Ironically, this is exactly the argument the White House is making these days. As Clinton said Friday, "Every single unbiased economic study says the best thing you can do if you're going to take a tax-cut path to grow the economy is to give payroll tax relief."

Lord knows how much money -- and time -- was wasted on the original Obama stimulus. Shortly before the 2010 election, Obama himself admitted that he learned the hard way that there's "no such thing" as a "shovel-ready job." That's an awfully expensive lesson.

I think the initial appeal of the stimulus for many liberals, Obama included, is that it dovetailed with progressive hubris and Democratic resentment, the two defining characteristics of Obama's base. The experts, with Obama as first among equals, insisted that all of the answers were obvious for the smart set.

Meanwhile, the partisans insisted they deserved unfettered rule after enduring the Bush captivity. Obama was elected by exploiting and exemplifying both sentiments. In his arrogance, he even disparaged the Clinton presidency as too mincing and modest. Then, on Friday, Obama recruited Clinton to help save his more ambitious presidency from ruin.

Bill, like everyone else, recognized Obama's comeuppance. Indeed, you could see it in Bill's smile.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: bho44; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2010 4:48:58 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What I saw was the last gasp of a seriously weakened old man. Somehow, in recent time he passed me in age and continues to accelerate the aging.


2 posted on 12/15/2010 4:55:38 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama only brought Clinton in because he had to go to a Christmas party with Moochelle. I mean, c’mon. What’s more important? The economy or a Christmas party with Moochelle?


3 posted on 12/15/2010 5:00:16 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But what if Obama had gone another way? What if he had rejected both the Democratic and the Republican stimulus bills and gone for a one-year payroll tax holiday of some kind, as many economists suggested at the time?

But, then, that would have stimulated the private sector, instead of enlarging government, and besides, wouldn't that help some people who make more than........?

4 posted on 12/15/2010 5:00:22 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

>> in recent time he passed me in age and continues to accelerate the aging.

Those STDs will do that to a man. He’d better put some ice on it.


5 posted on 12/15/2010 5:02:06 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

my dad is 84 y.o. and looks better than Bill Clinton — this man has been ravaged by STDs or something!


6 posted on 12/15/2010 5:04:57 AM PST by Enchante (12/10/10: Obama just abdicated his Presidency to Bill Clinton at the Tax Policy Press Conference!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

IF a frog had wings, he would not bust his butt everytime he jumped.


7 posted on 12/15/2010 5:08:20 AM PST by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Well if he doesn’t want moochelle to kick his ass AGAIN he’d best listen to what the shelf ass ugly says.


8 posted on 12/15/2010 5:10:58 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Just think! Clintoon was the most powerful Man in the World! And the only piece of Arse he could get was a Lewinsky, a fat, dumb Blob!


9 posted on 12/15/2010 5:13:17 AM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Greatest President :George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
You have to think Obama is wondering where he took a wrong turn.

I know the answer to that.

He took a wrong turn when he took his "affirmative action" acceptance to Harvard Law School, and RAN with it.

10 posted on 12/15/2010 5:13:49 AM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
You've got to give Barack Obama credit. His learning curve gets steeper and steeper..

It's not his 'learning curve'.
It's the 'Bell Curve' in action.

oh ... wait...my bad...

...............

11 posted on 12/15/2010 5:15:11 AM PST by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

STOP ALL THESE CRAP BILLS!! Wait until January and THEN CLEAN THEM UP!


12 posted on 12/15/2010 5:33:47 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Take your child to work day, Ramirez:
http://www.investors.com/EditorialCartoons/Cartoon.aspx?id=556756


13 posted on 12/15/2010 5:38:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Bump


14 posted on 12/15/2010 5:38:53 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Take your child to work day:


15 posted on 12/15/2010 5:39:06 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB
yep so true -- unfortunately for us.

Having Barry as POTUS is like having the dope smoking slacker in HS as class president.
He's a black version of Jeff Spicoli. Only Spicoli had a higher IQ.

[and Bigfoot Moochie is like teacher Mr Hand. She's around to keep Barry in line (no Pizza in the classroom Oval Office).]

16 posted on 12/15/2010 6:00:54 AM PST by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: True Republican Patriot
"Clintoon was the most powerful Man in the World! And the only piece of Arse he could get was a Lewinsky, a fat, dumb Blob!"

How true ............. and a priceless observation!

17 posted on 12/15/2010 6:12:38 AM PST by Old Badger (boy do opportunities abound everywhere for Real Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

AMATEUR NIGHT AT THE APOLLO !

(my bad too....)


18 posted on 12/15/2010 6:18:04 AM PST by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bert

There was something eerie about Clinton, as though he were channeling Ted Kennedy and the shade of dead Ted kept fading in and out.

Or is it Clinton’s eyes, always deepset but now just barely visible evil slits?


19 posted on 12/15/2010 6:24:07 AM PST by elcid1970 ("Buy Sabra brand Hummus, made in Israel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

cocaine is very hard on the heart.


20 posted on 12/15/2010 6:31:43 AM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson