Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeattleBruce
My question is— All voters were warned that misspelling
Murkowskies name would result in it not being counted per state law.

Those that did misspell her name, knew this and did it anyway. My conclusion is they did not want their union coerced vote to count.

25 posted on 12/14/2010 8:25:57 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: duckln

“Those that did misspell her name, knew this and did it anyway. My conclusion is they did not want their union coerced vote to count.”

Exactly. Sounds like a perfect read on their ‘intent’. And a much better take than some bureaucrat.


26 posted on 12/14/2010 11:18:31 PM PST by SeattleBruce (We voted - NOW we fight against vote fraud! Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: duckln

“My conclusion is they did not want their union coerced vote to count.”

I wouldn’t put it past the unions to coerce voters, but don’t they have secret voting for write-ins?


28 posted on 12/14/2010 11:40:20 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson