Now, to put the finishing touch on the Judge's ruling we need a mugging foiled because the "victim" shoots the attacker. The anti-gun crowd would no doubt howl that the criminal's Constitutional Rights were being "violated" if that ever happens.
The women of Seattle should remember the old saying...You can’t rape a .38.
Yep, I totally agree. (See my tag line.)
Un-armed and defenseless, we took our dogs for a walk in a Knoxville city park yesterday. If we had been attacked I would have whipped out my..... cel phone, and asked the attacker to put his attack on hold a few minutes, until the police arrived. Sheesh!
Just wait for it. The libs will say that in this case, the perp was using a knife, and was thus “honoring” the gun ban.
In a perfect world all conservatives would be carrying and criminals would just attack liberals and I’d have no problem with that since they don’t want to defend themselves anyway.
I’ve made this point a number of times on this forum, but here goes again. Do the people who rail about innocent people killed by handguns ever consider the number of people killed or seriously hurt because they didn’t have a gun? I doubt it. How many women would be alive today or not have undergone a sexual assault if they had been armed?