Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sarah is going to surprise a lot of people

mandalas,mandala,palin

PalinGenesis


1 posted on 12/10/2010 7:35:54 AM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mandaladon

There is nothing Presidential in our White House right now, IMO.


2 posted on 12/10/2010 7:37:36 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Oran Smith is probably a Huck booster.


3 posted on 12/10/2010 7:40:26 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Compared to Zero, Sarah can be way more “presidential”.
(Hell, my dog acts more presidential than that con man we have in office now!)


4 posted on 12/10/2010 7:42:18 AM PST by ozark hilljilly (Had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

“South Carolina wants a ‘more presidential’ Palin”

####

Yeah, well South Carolina, I want a more heterosexual Senator, than Foppsey.


5 posted on 12/10/2010 7:42:34 AM PST by EyeGuy (RaceMarxist Obama: The Politics of Vengeance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

What is “more presidential”? It’s as ambiguous as “not qualified” or “not experienced”. Is Huckabee, playing his guitar on his show on Fox “presidential”? Why should Palin act “more presidential” when she hasn’t even declared her candidacy? This is all such nonsense...


7 posted on 12/10/2010 7:45:56 AM PST by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

I’d like a more presidential rest of the field. Funny, that.


9 posted on 12/10/2010 7:49:31 AM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: BOOM. Taste My Cluebat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
Hey SC. I got two words for you. Lindsey Graham.
10 posted on 12/10/2010 7:52:12 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
I find it amusing how the media (including supposed conservatives) micro-analyses everything about Sarah Palin.

Why don't they ask so-called “opinion leaders” like Oran Smith, head of the Palmetto Family Council, how they feel about Mitt Romney not offering his opinion on any controversial issues.

11 posted on 12/10/2010 7:53:27 AM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon; onyx; ExTexasRedhead

If they found out who was “coaching” her on domestic and foreign affairs, she’d be called a “fundamentalist Christian” who wants to take us back to the 19th Century and take away women’s “reproductive rights” and a “Neo-Con” who wants to go to war with the whole Middle East or the like. Watch and see.


12 posted on 12/10/2010 7:59:59 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

I’m hoping that Palin has a detailed plan for the evolution of her public image. I’ve been a big fan of Palin since about six months after she became Governor, hoping that she would move to a national political role.

We all saw the gap between her experience (not values, not ability, but raw experience dealing with evil) and the level necessary to deal with our anti-American media. In her first few national interviews, she looked to me like someone caught completely off guard, like she expected a friendly conversation that would be edited in a professional manner to tell the true story of who she was and what she believed instead of what she encountered (an ambush designed to elicit answers that could be edited for the specific purpose of making her look bad). Considering the unexpected nature of those first few sets of questions, I didn’t think she did a terrible job - certainly not great, but not terrible. When she and her children were attacked with an insane level of venom, she dealt with it remarkably well and stood up to the hateful liberals. I liked that, but it gave them a chance to call her “divisive”.

In round 2, members of McCain’s staff and other RINOs went after her too. She’s handled that well and been a major force in reshaping the GOP under the Tea Party banner. We’re not done, but there is far more hope than I would have guessed just two years ago.

Today, she has her Internet and Twitter connections to her supporters. She has Sarah Palin’s Alaska to portray herself as a real person and get around the most remarkable level of media bias in our country’s history. She has her books, which are selling very well. I’m hoping that she also has a plan. Part of that is to project “presidential”, and I’m hoping her planned foreign travel is part of a conscious agenda to build that image (and the understanding through personal travel experience to match that image). What else should be on that agenda? Good question, and I hope Sarah has the answer and that some on FR have inside access and will provide those suggestions to her.


13 posted on 12/10/2010 8:01:12 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

Christine O’Donnell is a more presidential SP! She’s cute and sassy! She is also unemployed and maybe we can get her cheap.


17 posted on 12/10/2010 8:11:25 AM PST by HospiceNurse (Draft O'Donnell 4 President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
"South Carolina wants a 'more presidential' Palin"

South Carolina ISN'T the only state in the union...
18 posted on 12/10/2010 8:12:37 AM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

All she has to do is look less bad than Obama. So how much gravitas does BO have, foriegn policy wise; anyway?

I think when she points out that we have more important problems than closing GITMO, repeal of DADT and fake green jobs; she’ll get support.


21 posted on 12/10/2010 8:27:01 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
A happy homemaker, and my hope for America...

Elect Sarah Palin for President 2012

Re-Elect President Sarah Palin 2016

23 posted on 12/10/2010 8:54:59 AM PST by WVKayaker (Faith makes the discords of the present become the harmonies of the future - Robert Collyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
Nothing to be worried about, IMHO. I fully expect a very knowledgeable, articulate, almost policy-wonkish Sarah Palin to show up in the primary debates late next year and early in '012. That's assuming, of course, that she actually decides to run.

The woman is a natural fierce competitor, of very much underestimated intellect, whose policy statements on subjects she has familiarity with are at least as detail oriented and far more coherent than anything you'll hear from any of the other candidates being talked about.

She's lights out on energy policy and seems to be a very quick study. I expect she will still have the wink and twinkle in the eye, but when the time comes to show "gravitas" in a debate her performance will "shock" the casual observers who now only have the press invented "dumb" and aggressive but too country "Alaska Mama Bear" personas to tag her with.

24 posted on 12/10/2010 8:55:48 AM PST by katana (Not that there's anything wrong with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon

It’s a cosmetic point only, but some voice coaching lessons to take the edge off her speaking voice will do a lot for her.

I remind FReepers (not for the first time) that Thatcher’s original Grantham accent was harsh enough to erode the Schiarapelli canals on Mars. She took lessons and went on to save Britain.

Palin has much less of a problem with her voice, but I believe that some vocal coaching would be an excellent investment for her.


26 posted on 12/10/2010 9:47:35 AM PST by agere_contra (...what if we won't eat the dog food?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mandaladon
"They like Palin's values, but they're still hoping she can make herself more viable in the sense that she is a little more knowledgeable and a little more presidential. They're not going to be interested in her simply because she's conservative and nice and popular."

bump

35 posted on 12/12/2010 10:53:16 AM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson