Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are ‘guns in bars’ automatically ‘a dangerous combination’?
Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 8 December, 2010 | David Codrea

Posted on 12/10/2010 5:00:17 AM PST by marktwain

“Dangerous combination,” The Akron Beacon Journal editorial headline reads. “A lame-duck maneuver to allow guns in bars,” the subhead clarifies.

Ohio Rep. Danny Bubp is trying to get enough signatures on discharge petitions to force two gun bills passed earlier in the Senate to the House floor for a vote. Oxymoronically, the "Authorized Journalists," who ordinarily present themselves as champions of democracy, along with House Democrats, don’t want a vote to happen:

In the House, Armond Budish, the Democratic speaker, wisely has taken a firm stand against the bills. The Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police, the Fraternal Order of Police, the Buckeye Sheriffs' Association and other law enforcement organizations have raised strong objections to allowing concealed weapons in places that serve alcohol. Even when Gov. Ted Strickland promised last summer to sign the bills, House Democrats held ranks. They listened to the common-sense advice from police agencies: Guns and alcohol are a bad mix.

It’s a non-controversial enough bill—to anyone who isn’t an anti-defense zealot prone to hysterics, be they sincere or opportunistic. “Bars,” used as a pejorative, include family restaurants that serve beer and wine. And nothing in the bill “legalizes” drinking while dining armed.

While the gun-grabbers portray it as an open invitation for drunken cowboys to shoot up saloons (and these are the same hand-wringers who warned against Dodge City gunfights over fender-benders in their attempts to defeat concealed carry reforms), what this really will do is allow a law-compliant choice for those who peaceably carry when they patronize establishments that serve alcohol—like Luby’s Cafeteria, site of a madman’s rampage, where the “law-abiding” patrons like Susanna Hupp were disarmed by law, and powerless to stop a massacre.

Naturally, the cop organizations are against you having a choice in the matter. But guess who’s exempt?

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; bars; codrea; examiner; guns; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Most states allow permit holders to carry guns in establishments that serve alcohol. The permit holders have far less problems than the general population.
1 posted on 12/10/2010 5:00:23 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

When I walk into a bar, I normally have left my weapon in the car. However, if we’re walking around, say a shopping district, and I’m carrying, and want to stop and have a toddy for the body, I don’t check it at the door!


2 posted on 12/10/2010 5:07:26 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I live in Alaska, we carry almost everywhere except Federal buildings, schools for the most part and places that request no weapons.

We have one town that has such a severe and dangerous problem with a pack of wolves that all the residents are urged to carry at all times and at all places.


3 posted on 12/10/2010 5:12:29 AM PST by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

As a recovering alcoholic, I used to disarm before going into an establishment to eat and drink. Having been sober for almost a year, I have to say that I would much prefer my safety to drinking any day. It’s nice to be able to sit down in Applebees with my revolver holstered and never be concerned about having a run-in with John Q. Law.


4 posted on 12/10/2010 5:13:58 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

I think it should be up to the owner of the establishment.

Some types of places I would be comfortable with them allowing guns. Other places like bigger clubs that are frequented by power drinkers and have fights regularly it is probably a better idea not to allow guns in.

Not everyone with a gun or a gun permit isn’t an idiot. Get a few of these idiots armed in the same place on the same night and bystanders are bound to be the ones who get hurt.


5 posted on 12/10/2010 5:14:35 AM PST by BookaT (My cat's breath smells like cat food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Just because you have a gun doesn’t make you more inclined to start shooting it. We have many guns at our house, and I have never felt the urge to shoot anyone.

Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. There was a local family feud where a man was beaten to death with a Tennis Racket by his son in law and daughter.

You could stab someone or beat them with a chair. People are so afraid of guns. A friend of mine from Holland told me that people shouldn’t go hunting. They should buy their meat at the grocery store, that way “No animals have to DIE” Her “logic” is illogical!


6 posted on 12/10/2010 5:17:38 AM PST by buffyt (Abortion is the ultimate CHILD ABUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Bars, churches, schools, college campus - I don't know what's supposed to be so special about any of those places. Oregon doesn't restrict any of them (though the leftist run schools and colleges would rather it did). I don't know about where I live now, I haven't asked.

The second amendment is my permit.

7 posted on 12/10/2010 5:18:24 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

No. It’s much safer than having only criminals carrying guns in bars. Or knives. Or stun guns. Or whatever else criminals carry. Why handicap the good guys?


8 posted on 12/10/2010 5:19:06 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Only if he walks in.

9 posted on 12/10/2010 5:24:47 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Heck Yes! Most bars not only have drinking going on but smoking as well.

And we ALL know that when you have idiots combining Alcohol,Tobacco and Firearms you get horrible disasters like Waco and Ruby Ridge.

10 posted on 12/10/2010 5:34:55 AM PST by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I dont consider a restaurant that serves alcohol to be a typical bar. To me a bar is a place where people go primarily to drink or get drunk. IMO opinion guns and alcohol are not a good combo. I keep out of bars even if I’m not drinking and would never go into one armed. Too many idiots looking to pick fights. I know, I used to be one.


11 posted on 12/10/2010 5:35:42 AM PST by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

The most dangerous place where alcohol and firearms mix is the bar parking lot. Even thugs don’t start a gunfight in the bar.
Read any big city newspaper local news.
“Gunfight breaks out at 3 AM Saturday at the local bar”.


12 posted on 12/10/2010 5:40:17 AM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BookaT

” Other places like bigger clubs that are frequented by power drinkers and have fights regularly it is probably a better idea not to allow guns in.”

The owner can do that simply by posting a sign at the door. That’s the way it is for other establishments.

It’s a felony to carry into such a place.


13 posted on 12/10/2010 5:56:01 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

Actually, it’s a misdemeanor,
but you can lose your CCL.


14 posted on 12/10/2010 5:57:05 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BookaT
I think it should be up to the owner of the establishment.

I tend to agree, but the law in Florida says no carrying where alcohol is served. I definitely make exceptions for a restaurant that serves alcohol. I always carry then. My law enforcement friends generally know I'm carrying, as are they. So, I guess they figure, the more the merrier.

15 posted on 12/10/2010 5:57:31 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

So, would you have been as big of an idiot looking for a fight if you had a reasonable doubt that the guy you’re targeting for a fight might be armed?

“An armed society is a polite society”


16 posted on 12/10/2010 5:58:10 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

So, would you have been as big of an idiot looking for a fight if you had a reasonable doubt that the guy you’re targeting for a fight might be armed?

“An armed society is a polite society”


17 posted on 12/10/2010 5:58:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BookaT
I think it should be up to the owner of the establishment.

Concur with this statement on almost every issue. Some will say its unconstitutional, but that's only because they have bought into the notion that private business are somehow public property.

18 posted on 12/10/2010 6:02:02 AM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Personally I find going to bars not too intelligent armed or not.

Lots of person on person crime happens in them.

I prefer to be smart and avoid those type of places.

19 posted on 12/10/2010 7:24:25 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Most states allow permit holders to carry guns in establishments that serve alcohol. The permit holders have far less problems than the general population.

And PA and I believe one or two others even "allow" the carriers to drink, and the bodies aren't piling up. Ergo, it's safe.

20 posted on 12/10/2010 8:05:16 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson