Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Students attack Prince Charles' car after fee hike
Associated Press ^ | December 9, 2010

Posted on 12/09/2010 2:35:06 PM PST by Deo volente

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Newton

I believe the UK recently raised the tax rate to fifty percent for their Wall Street types and other high earners. That sounds like Make the Rich Pay.


81 posted on 12/09/2010 9:10:12 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Then they should start deporting their illegals and non-permanent-resident aliens until there are some.


82 posted on 12/09/2010 9:15:37 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Newton

MAKE THE RICH PAY,, er, UNTIL I’M RICHIE RICH, THEN KEEP THOSE DAMN STUDENTS AWAY FROM ME!


83 posted on 12/09/2010 11:09:55 PM PST by MaxMax (Conservatism isn't a party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
And how is getting drunk fun? As for charity, why not do something more decent?

Do continue, your ridiculously extreme moralizing is quite amusing.

But... you know what I think? I think you're one of those Masonic Blueblood Snobs who is just pissed - pissed I tell you - that Kate Middleton is not of Royal descent.

But you forget yourself, don't you? Prince William has chosen, and compared to your so-called "standing" you are worm at His exalted feet. Your superior has ruled indeed, and only a Masonic traitor would object. So mind your manners, wretched serf, or face the price of insolence towards your Prince.

:: sigh :: Keeping the lower degrees in line is such a bore...

84 posted on 12/09/2010 11:40:36 PM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Little Pharma
I once read an article (on line= so take with a grain of salt) that discussed the amount of money that Britain has to spend to maintain the crown. Can’t remember the figure but remember thinking that it was a big sum. Given that the queen is one of the riches people on earth, maybe austerity should include eliminating the monarchy. Not defending the violence but I can understand the sentiment.

In actual fact, the monarchy is a really good financial deal for Britain.

The majority of the wealth of the monarchy is tied up in what is called the Crown Estate. This isn't the property of the Queen, but it is the property of the Monarch and the Royal Family, and if the Monarchy was abolished legally the Crown Estate would revert to the family. Leaving aside the entire question of royalty and just thinking of the Windsors as just a rich family (like the Rockefeller or the Vanderbilts) etc, government can't just seize their property and assets - they have the same rights as anyone else.

Since the reign of King George III, there has been a deal in place (reconfirmed with each new King or Queen) by which the revenues and profits of the Crown Estate are given to the government of Great Britain to be used for the public good. In exchange for these revenues, the government pays the official expenses of the Monarch and their Consort. This is the money that Britain pays to maintain the crown. It is called the Civil List.

The Civil List amount is currently fixed at £7,900,000 per year. It has been at that level since 1990. That's quite a lot of money certainly. But...

The Crown Estate is currently valued at about £6,000,000,000. The income from the Crown Estate in a typical year is around £200,000,000 (the most recent figure for July 2009 to July 2010 is £210,700,000). That money is all given to the British treasury.

So the Treasury is giving the Queen £7,900,000 and getting back £210,700,000 - a profit to the Treasury of £202,800,000 this year. Put it another way - the Queen pays a functional income tax rate of 96.25% on the revenues of the Crown Estate.

(The Queen also has the income from the Duchy of Lancaster (around £10,000,000 a year), and the Prince of Wales has the income from the Duchy of Cornwall (around £16,000,000 a year) but even if you count these in (and bear in mind these are the profits of normal corporate activities and businesses/rents/etc), out of about £250,000,000 a year the 'Windsor Family' is entitled to in the same way any other wealthy family is (admittedly there aren't that many families that are that rich - on this type of measure the Queen is one of the fifty richest people on Earth, probably just into the top twenty), they get to keep about £40,000,000 and hand over £210,000,000).

Financially it's a good deal for Britain, unless people advocate seizing property without compensation.

85 posted on 12/09/2010 11:44:49 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

Where was security to allow these people anywhere near him?


86 posted on 12/10/2010 12:08:57 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

Good example of how an entitlement society rots the soul of a nation. Some are turning this into a debate over the concept of the Royal Family...which has nothing to do with what happened here - totally separate issue.


87 posted on 12/10/2010 12:18:47 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

LOL!! Those are two Upper-Class Twits of the Year if I ever saw them.


88 posted on 12/10/2010 6:44:59 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

I dont drink myself, but I also dont think the lassie is the whore of Babylon because she is a young person who has a few drinks in a nightclub once in a while.

Also, are you honestly saying lingerie is indecent?. She wore lingerie in a closed public show specifically to help a charity. Cant really see anything that indecent about what she did. Not as if she sashayed down the high street in St Andrews flashing her nether regions. BTW, she modelled many normal clothes for the charity, its was the skimpy lingerie that of clourse got printed by the press.


89 posted on 12/10/2010 6:57:55 AM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
I bet any one of them could get a job tomorrow, washing dishes, sweeping floors, loading trucks, etc., jobs I took when going to college without free tuition.
90 posted on 12/10/2010 7:51:00 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

Yes, humans who have devolved into parasites are prone to unpredictable, instantaneous rages when provoked. It is a symptom of the atrophy of their prefrontal lobes due to lack of stimulation.


91 posted on 12/10/2010 7:58:12 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Easy. They are doing degrees in Politics or Sociology, where hard work is, frankly, optional.


92 posted on 12/12/2010 4:30:57 PM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Youre just jealous cos she looks better than Michelle Obama.


93 posted on 12/12/2010 4:33:08 PM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

It wouldn’t...but attacking royalty immediately loses large sections of public support for their cause. That’s ok though, because the anarchist agitators leading the charge don’t care a toss about poor students struggling to pass exams. This is just another excuse to “have a go” at the establishment i.e. Western Civ capitalist democracy.


94 posted on 12/12/2010 4:36:30 PM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan; ThePatriotsFlag

he was not actually driving the car guys.


95 posted on 12/12/2010 4:40:26 PM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

Camilla or Kater-Tots? Frankly, I’m not jealous of that creature’s reputation (Kate’s) and answer me in all honesty, would you want a daughter-in-law with her reputation?


96 posted on 12/13/2010 7:19:19 AM PST by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

“Reputation” is the sum total of what OTHER people think. In other words, its a glorified collection of gossip. I prefer to make my own judgement of people based on what I know, and certainly rather than what Britain’s notoriously sensationalist and low-brow gutter press reckons.


97 posted on 12/14/2010 1:08:58 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson