A resolution impeaching G. Thomas Porteous - GUILTY (Shocking /sarcasm look who voted NOT GUILTY)

A resolution impeaching G. Thomas Porteous - GUILTY (Shocking /sarcasm look who voted NOT GUILTY)
Senate Roll Call vote #264 ^

Posted on 12/08/2010 10:02:48 AM PST by davidosborne

Shocking !! /sarcasm

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; connecticut; december2010; gthomasporteous; guilty; illinois; impeachment; iowa; judge; kansas; louisiana; maryland; michigan; minnesota; nevada; neworleans; porteous; slickwillie; spartansixdelta

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 last

To: Impy; davidosborne; fieldmarshaldj; BykrBayb; Ray'sBeth; campaignPete R-CT

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00261

Question: Guilty or Not Guilty (Article I, Articles of Impeachment v. Judge G. Thomas Porteous )
Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Guilty Kirk (R-IL), Not Voting

I’ll be damned. Dick Turban has officially done more to “stop criminal Democrats” during the lame duck session than DIABLO Mark Kirk!

81 posted on 12/09/2010 10:23:47 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794