Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

The Swedish charges are very shonky. Apparently it is ‘sex by surprise’ and also a suggestion that because he was famous, the women could not exercise free will. Rubbish!


24 posted on 12/07/2010 4:24:39 AM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: BlackVeil
You make the best point of all:

I'll not defend Assange leaking secret documents, but I want to know just who in Hell do the damned Swedes think they are to suddenly stand up and begin crowing and leveling accusations as to one man's immorality?

The damnable Swedes who have dethroned every last vestige of morality ever vested in civil society; the morally bankrupt Swedes who have enshrined in Law that speech against certain forms of immorality is criminal; and NOW this morally vacuous reprobate nation deigns to stand up and pose as some kind bastion of morality??

And the Brits, as well. Benny Hill wasn't debauched enough for them, but now they have the unholy flaming gall to feign indignation and side with the Swedish poseurs?

Assange may be liable to criminal prosecution on the basis of his acquisition and publication of secret documents, but the Swedes and the Brits haven't a moral leg to stand on in seeking to prosecuting him for his immorality.

72 posted on 12/07/2010 12:18:02 PM PST by HKMk23 (Quit worryin' what other folks think; they don't do it all that much anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson