Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackVeil
You make the best point of all:

I'll not defend Assange leaking secret documents, but I want to know just who in Hell do the damned Swedes think they are to suddenly stand up and begin crowing and leveling accusations as to one man's immorality?

The damnable Swedes who have dethroned every last vestige of morality ever vested in civil society; the morally bankrupt Swedes who have enshrined in Law that speech against certain forms of immorality is criminal; and NOW this morally vacuous reprobate nation deigns to stand up and pose as some kind bastion of morality??

And the Brits, as well. Benny Hill wasn't debauched enough for them, but now they have the unholy flaming gall to feign indignation and side with the Swedish poseurs?

Assange may be liable to criminal prosecution on the basis of his acquisition and publication of secret documents, but the Swedes and the Brits haven't a moral leg to stand on in seeking to prosecuting him for his immorality.

72 posted on 12/07/2010 12:18:02 PM PST by HKMk23 (Quit worryin' what other folks think; they don't do it all that much anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: HKMk23

Because it’s on feminists’ defense, duh. And he’s a white man. And it’s Sweden, the PM is probably a pansy that would be forced to resign if the newspapers publish a short note about how he let go a hideous foreign raper celebrity or something.


75 posted on 12/07/2010 12:46:55 PM PST by Moose Burger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: HKMk23
Many thanks for your input, and the more I read about this complaint, the more astonished I am. Apparently, in Sweden, rape is not defined by coercion, but rather by intruding upon the other person's rights. This is such a complicated definition, that lawyers say that many women do not know if they were raped, because they are "not lawyers."

Anyway, these two victims look like they were indulging in what Americans term Monday morning quarterbacking.

Jessica made contact with Sarah almost by coincidence, when she phoned a Labour Party office looking for Mr Assange - who had earlier promised to call her - only to discover she was not the only woman he had slept with that weekend, The Times reported. She then confided to the woman she barely knew that she had had unprotected sex and was worried about the possibility of sexually transmitted diseases, the newspaper reported.

This is why a woman ought to not have sex with some man she only just met. She might regret it afterwards. The cad might not even give her a call later. And he might have another lady on the side.

Mind you, Assange was an imbecile as well. He should have kept his zipper up. A person in his position needs to be discreet and aloof, not rolling in the hay with Swedish feminists.

95 posted on 12/08/2010 2:47:31 AM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson