To: Josa
The only thing I have not seen fully addressed is "where did it go???".
As much as I would love a good conspiracy, I'm getting pretty sold that this was a jet liner and the "where did it go" question is answered by "It landed".
4 posted on
12/06/2010 6:36:53 AM PST by
Michael Barnes
(Guilty of being White.)
To: Michael Barnes
The only thing I have not seen fully addressed is "where did it go???".
It's the ocean, not a lake.
6 posted on
12/06/2010 6:41:33 AM PST by
crosshairs
(The word for actor in Greek is hypocrite (its true).)
To: Michael Barnes
Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile
Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast and recorded by a KCBS television crew came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near Los Angeles did not come from a jet but rather, they say the exhaust and the billowing plume emanated from a single source nozzle of a missile, probably made in China.
They further suggest the missile was fired from a submerged Chinese nuclear submarine off America's coast, and point out that the timing of the alleged Chinese missile shot coincided with an increasing confrontation between the U.S. and China, and was likely meant to send a message to Washington.
Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8.
9 posted on
12/06/2010 6:46:51 AM PST by
Eagle of Liberty
(formally known as Kerretarded....I changed my name)
To: Michael Barnes
Probably some sort of test launch that stayed in the test area?
10 posted on
12/06/2010 6:47:39 AM PST by
GeronL
To: Michael Barnes
If it was ours you don’t have a need to know. If it was China’s there’s alot of barren land there that could have been the impact zone.
11 posted on
12/06/2010 6:47:40 AM PST by
McGruff
To: Michael Barnes
"where did it go???".
I posed the same question the day it happened.
IF it were a foreign missile, it was shot for demonstration purposes and not at a specific land target. Thus, it was intended for show and probably landed in the Pacific, far from any land mass.
IF it were a foreign missile, they were more at sending a warning message "see what we can do."
Rumors have circulated that the oil rig explosion(s) in the Gulf could possible be caused by NK subs.
Recall that recently a Chinese sub, undetected, surfaced in the middle of a US Navy fleet operation.
I have a feeling some foreign powers are hinting that they, too, have some big sticks.
26 posted on
12/06/2010 7:27:32 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Michael Barnes
> “The only thing I have not seen fully addressed is “where did it go???”.”
.
On its observed heading, if it didn’t run out of fuel and fall in the ocean, its nearest possible landfall would have been the Kanchatka penninsula.
49 posted on
12/06/2010 9:59:10 AM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
To: Michael Barnes
I'm getting pretty sold that this was a jet liner and the "where did it go" question is answered by "It landed".
...and no immediate on shore reports of the sighting other than the video taken at least 30 miles inland.........
National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency
Now that's a new one!...........
184 posted on
12/06/2010 5:40:02 PM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(There's only one cure for Obamarrhea......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson