Posted on 12/06/2010 6:26:46 AM PST by Sprite518
I watched the full video referred to in the post I replied to...
Not ‘just a friend’ but a friend with extensive military and commercial flight training and 20 plus years experience
Not ‘just a friend’ but a friend with extensive military and commercial flight training and 20 plus years experience
Okay I cannot help to ask you this question. Like the picture it’s pretty funny.
Do you honestly believe IF it was a missile launch by a Sub from China do you really think the government/Obama administation would admit it??? LOL!
I think we ALL know the obvious answer the the above question.
> “From a missile that had a longer powered flight phase and, therefore, because of the time it was under direct observation, a slower air speed than any other known missile”
.
More low grade propaganda?
There is nothing about the televised video that would yield any power or velocity info, because it was shot after the fact, not during flight.
.
NATCOM?
Links please for the flights, flight paths....
Also, from another person who lives in the midwest and sees plane contrails on almost a daily basis, I assume the flight paths for your cited flights will match an estimated curvature of the earth consistent with the direction of the exhaust being produced in the video.
> “The only thing I have not seen fully addressed is “where did it go???”.”
.
On its observed heading, if it didn’t run out of fuel and fall in the ocean, its nearest possible landfall would have been the Kanchatka penninsula.
LMAO! I guess there are some here that say don’t believe your eyes and believe what Obama tells you.
> “While ships would have been all around the approximate launch site...”
.
There are numerous little “proofs” floating around that prove “mathematically” that 1 = 2, or 1 = 0, and each of them begins with a logical fallacy, much like the obvious fallacy above from your post.
.
Did you try clicking on the World net link. Here it is for you. It does not cost you to read it.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=235013
Bingo... That report is to to give you an idea of when missiles have been fired. That way you have some sort of barometer. Nothing more..
Bingo... That report is to to give you an idea of when missiles have been fired. That way you have some sort of barometer. Nothing more..
Yes. Did you read your own link? All it offers is "Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin intelligence report" at a cost.
Oh so you are now saying there is no article???
There is a full article you can read. Do I need to copy and paste it for you??? If you want to go further into it, then I guess yes. LOL!
> “He said you could even see the guidance system kick in.”
.
When a missile is launched, the flight is first controlled by inertial guidance systems onboard, but once stable flight is achieved, a geodessic guidance system takes over, taking the vehicle to its intended target.
The point at which the geodessic systems take over is always very detectable by a marked adjustment in trajectory.
Capiche?
There is an article and it is a vehicle for selling subscriptions.
Yeah I think it’s an Air Force Base.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.