U.S. warned people to avoid mystery missile zone

World Net Daily ^ | 12/01/2010 | F. Michael Maloof

[Sprite518]

The Department of Defense is slamming the door on questions about the mysterious contrail filmed Nov. 8 by a KCBS television crew near Los Angeles after questions were raised about a warning from the National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency that there could be missiles fired in that area at that time.

[Sprite518]

I knew it. The government lied again... Imagine that???

The video in the article says it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WGcSuGojYA&feature=player_embedded

[Sprite518]

Here you click on this leak. I hope this goes viral!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WGcSuGojYA&feature=player_embedded

[Josa]

Friend who is former fighter pilot and current commercial pilot said that contrail was definitely not from an airplane.....his opinion is it was a missile.

[Michael Barnes]

The only thing I have not seen fully addressed is "where did it go???".

As much as I would love a good conspiracy, I'm getting pretty sold that this was a jet liner and the "where did it go" question is answered by "It landed".

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

Bookmarking!

[crosshairs]

The only thing I have not seen fully addressed is "where did it go???".

It's the ocean, not a lake.

[alicewonders]

Bookmarking for later, thanks.

[PetroniusMaximus]

Hannity had an Air Force office on who said exactly the same thing.

He said you could even see the guidance system kick in.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Experts: Mystery contrail was from Chinese missile

Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near Los Angeles did not come from a jet – but rather, they say the exhaust and the billowing plume emanated from a single source nozzle of a missile, probably made in China.

They further suggest the missile was fired from a submerged Chinese nuclear submarine off America's coast, and point out that the timing of the alleged Chinese missile shot coincided with an increasing confrontation between the U.S. and China, and was likely meant to send a message to Washington.

Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8.

[GeronL]

Probably some sort of test launch that stayed in the test area?

[McGruff]

If it was ours you don’t have a need to know. If it was China’s there’s alot of barren land there that could have been the impact zone.

[Fundamentally Fair]

The article is nothing but an ad for extended World Nut Daily coverage...$99 per year, or $9.95 per month...geez.

[UCANSEE2]

He said you could even see the guidance system kick in.

Funniest post of the thread!!!!

[Ditter]

After reading articles yesterday I was convinced it was a plane, now I have been flipped back the other way. What to believe, what to believe????????

[fso301]

Folks! The sea off the Southern California coast is full of ships; inbound and outbound. Many if not most of the ships have security cameras running 24/7. While ships would have been all around the approximate launch site, there was not one single whisper from one single vessel about having sighted anything resembling a missile launch.

[reagan_fanatic]

If you watched the full video, it was quite clear that it was a missle of some kind, not a contrail from an airplane.

Either we shot off a missle and just don’t want to admit it, or a foreign power did so to demonstrate the Obama Administration’s weakness.

[UCANSEE2]

but rather, they say the exhaust and the billowing plume emanated from a single source nozzle of a missile, probably made in China.

One must assume they could see the MADE IN CHINA stamp on the nozzle, from the video they watched.

They further suggest the missile was fired from a submerged Chinese nuclear submarine off America's coast, and point out that the timing of the alleged Chinese missile shot coincided with an increasing confrontation between the U.S. and China, and was likely meant to send a message to Washington.

Well, if the nozzle was Chinese, proving it was a Chinese missile, then it just goes without saying it had to have been fired from a Chinese Sub. I mean, that totally, like, proves it.

Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration documents that there were no aircraft flying in the area at that time, the night of Nov. 8.

Actually, NATCOM had two flights in that exact area, at that exact time, but that would ruin the missile story, and reduce readership of WND, so let's just lie to keep the money coming in.

[UCANSEE2]

Probably some sort of test launch that stayed in the test area?

If you get the right weather conditions, and position yourself in the same spot, you can see this 'test launch' several times a week.

I've seen the same thing and I live in the middle of the U.S. Those Chinese missiles have a really impressive thrust time and awesome range. Wish we had some.

[UCANSEE2]

If it was ours you don’t have a need to know.

That's what OBAMA said about his B.C. He's our President and we don't have a need to know.

[ltc8k6]

Well, I watched the full video, and it’s quite clearly an airliner to me.