Posted on 12/04/2010 1:45:25 PM PST by TheHawksNest
The other day Salon ran a piece about a “scientific” study that made the astounding claim that we can cut down on child rape by allowing degenerates to view child pornography. To her credit, Tracy Clark-Flory surprised child advocates everywhere by almost disagreeing with such putrid pseudo-science:
The study certainly raises interesting philosophical questions about promoting objectionable material to prevent real-world crimes — but it’s also majorly flawed. A couple of big-time caveats: Diamond’s research finds a correlation between child pornography and sex abuse, which is not the same as causation; and in the Czech case, pornography in general (including kiddie porn) was legalized, not just kiddie porn. It’s also worth noting that the observed drop is in reported child sex abuse.
Like I said, almost. Surely she would probably lose her precious slot at Salon if she actually pointed out that this so-called study is little more than Kinsey-esque data manipulation designed to help the cause of child pornographers, so her tepid criticism is welcome and appreciated.
What she didn’t point out in her milquetoast critique was that child pornography is itself a crime of sexual abuse. The images and videos we’re talking about are the evidence of sexual exploitation of children of the most horrible and degrading kind. Too many people don’t understand what child pornography actually entails and thus see it as the lesser of two evils, as opposed to part of the overall victimization of the most helpless amongst us.
This brings me to the leering visage above.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
Come Lord Jesus.
The only thing these perverts need is a noose.
God will have the last word and deal with these low life scum.
Strap this creep to a pole and turn a flame-thrower on ‘em.
Have we become so dull witted as a culture that we have to wonder if perverts would still rape children after masturbating to images of children being raped?Pray.
Perverts are really running the country
Salon has sold “art” in the past that could be considered porn or close to it. I remember getting in a flame war with someone on FR who defended it. The pic in question was a naked and bound girl.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
People are born with same sex attraction. Well, if thats the case these disgusting perverts who are attracted to children are born that way as well. And those who find animals sexually exciting are also born that way. And as such, society must accommodate them - or so the liberal BS goes.
Look up!
we can cut down on child rape by allowing cutting down the offending organs of degenerates. to view child pornography
You are exactly right. I even vaguely remember a pedophile making the “born that way” and “you heteronormals just wouldn’t understand” arguments as a defense in court.
It didn’t go over well with the jury, of course, but if things keep going like they’re going, juries won’t count - only pervert judges who have no respect for any law above themselves.
Well I've got nasty news for YOU. Percentage wise homosexuals do the MOST MOLESTATION! Yes, homosexual comprise at most 1-3% of the population but in comparison to the other heterosexual percentage, hands down, HOMOSEXAULS do the most SAME SEX MOLESTATION but they will dabble in opposite sex molestation too. AGE IS NOT A BOUNDARY for HOMOSEXUALS!
Example:
A pair of pedophiles known to be active in the online sex offender community named Jeff Brisson and Harold Spurling moved in together in a cozy Connecticut home where it was rumored the two began a relationship with each other. During their “romance” they were found to be molesting a 14-year-old boy. The boy reported that the pair showed him child pornography involving children as young as five but police were shocked to find that the two had sunk to even lower depths. A neighbor allowed them to baby sit her 3-month-old girl.
Brisson had filmed himself raping the infant. The pair had filmed themselves raping several children in fact.
Clearly in this case access to child pornography not only didn’t stop the pair, but they used it as a prop in their crimes.
Read it and weep. It's ILLEGAL TO VIEW this vile stuff. To VIEW it as therapy shows how CRAZY people are. It encourages them to ACT ON IT.
No one is “born that way”.
What happens is they are ABUSED, sexually, emotionally etc. and when they are of age, ACT OUT ON IT SEXUALLY or otherwise.
The human garbage that advocates this filth don’t have children of their own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.