To: Vaquero
If you want to get into trouble at Free Republic, argue that given the natural law right to self defense, if you could afford it, it is acceptable for you to own a nuclear powered aircraft carrier battle group with air wing. That's how you find out how serious the posers are in their support for the constitution. Hint: it's not even about the 2nd Amendment. They just wanted to give special emphasis to this point. Under the Constitution the Feds cannot regulate firearms anyway. But they said in the 2nd that the States can't either and the Fed dam sure can't!
20 posted on
12/02/2010 3:42:10 PM PST by
DariusBane
(People are like sheep and have two speeds: grazing and stampede)
To: DariusBane
obviously there is a technology cut off point....a tac-nuke would not constitute a RKBA issue.
where to draw the line? that is a rough one.
21 posted on
12/02/2010 5:08:48 PM PST by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein.)
To: DariusBane
I’d agree with you, otherwise there would be no point in privateers.
25 posted on
12/04/2010 2:45:59 PM PST by
Eagle Eye
(A blind clock finds a nut at least twice a day.)
To: DariusBane; Vaquero
"If you want to get into trouble at Free Republic, argue that given the natural law right to self defense, if you could afford it, it is acceptable for you to own a nuclear powered aircraft carrier battle group with air wing." I've made that argument on Free Republic before and haven't got in any trouble. In fact, I've persuaded a few people to agree with me.
27 posted on
12/04/2010 2:52:22 PM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson