Posted on 12/02/2010 6:21:47 AM PST by yoe
The Department of Defense is slamming the door on questions about the mysterious contrail filmed Nov. 8 by a KCBS television crew near Los Angeles after questions were raised about a warning from the National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency that there could be missiles fired in that area at that time.
The official government position has been that the contrail, which appears to have been made by a single source, was from a jet passing by.
And the refusal to provide answers to specific questions suggests a cover-up of potential secret missile testing in the area – contrary to official jet contrail explanation.
For weeks, experts have examined the billowing plume and the single-source white-hot exhaust which they contend was from a missile, not a jet.
It was in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin intelligence report where the story was broken that several experts who examined the video of the mysterious contrail confirmed it was not from a jet but a missile.
The experts who examined the video have had extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems for various sensitive agencies of the U.S. government.
They even went so far as to suggest that the missile may have been shot from a submerged Chinese nuclear submarine, coinciding with an increasing level of confrontation between the United States and China and designed to send a message to Washington:
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
via the link given you....
http://articles.ocregister.com/2009-12-31/blogs/24546879_1_images-rocket-crystal-cove
How many were coming from Hawaii at altitude?
Only 2.
If you have data to prove your point, please post it. You haven’t in a full month.
None of them were videos. None of them were investigated by the Pentagon.
Another falsehood. The Pentagon issued a statement the day after it happened.
Oh, that’s gotta sting....
A reporter makes a crappy video, zoomed in, shows a tiny bit of it and all the kooks get all excited hoping that its a missile. So excited that logic and reason got drowned out.
If you’re going to link to my posts you should have the common courtesy to ping me. Of course that would be the first time you ever displayed common courtesy in this entire debate.
When was that link given to me? There was no link or story about it on Con-trailscience.com.
You haven’t shown any common courtesy, and yet you demand it?
But, nice deflect from the issue.
Have you got any data to prove your missile belief?
Its getting to be like the Great Pumpkin.
You’re a scumbag. You deserve none.
You have called me every name in the book for the last month.
Why? Because, in your heart, you know I’m right. All I ask for is some data. Give me data that proves your point, and I will say its a missile.
You have been given all the data in the world to prove that its a contrail, and yet all you have is insults and personal attacks.
How childish.
So, do you have any data?
No, just you. When you start the insults don't be surprised to get them back.
You are deflecting again.
Do you have any data to prove it was a missile?
Focus
When I practice common courtesy and ping you, you claim I'm "stalking" you.
You can't have it both ways...
When I practice common courtesy and ping you, you claim I'm "stalking" you.
You can't have it both ways...
That is absurd. The only person I have accused of stalking me didn’t use my name or link to a post of mine without pinging me. He posts to me every day or every other day with an insult and no context to the post he is replying to. You con-trail folks sure make a lot of things up don’t you? lol
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My, my, my! What have we here?
You mean the stalking of me and adding nothing to your side of the debate except insults? Put a leash on your monkey, TX.
637 posted on December 1, 2010 4:20:45 PM CST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.