Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker
"It has all sorts of procedural and due process provisions, privileges and even rights that you will find incredibly annoying."
Does this include the right to call the president of the united states as a witness in a failure to deploy charge?????? I cannot stand fubo, but I cannot stand those that fail to see and use simple logic even more..
138 posted on 12/02/2010 5:24:09 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: joe fonebone

Joe, go to post 132 and answer what tired old conservative hasn’t yet answered: In the Authorization to Use Force, what military officer did Congress authorize to “use appropriate force” in Afghanistan?

What military officer acting independently of the President has the authority to tell Lakin and other soldiers to go to Afghanistan and conduct combat operations there? Lind said Obama’s Constitutional status is irrelevant because Congress said the military didn’t need no stinkin’ president in order to give Lakin those orders.

Precisely WHERE did Congress authorize “the military” to use force in Afghanistan? It wasn’t in the Authorization to Use Force, so where was it? That is the crux of Lind’s whole argument that Obama’s status is irrelevant. She’s going to send a distinguished, noble officer to jail based on exactly what?


139 posted on 12/02/2010 6:18:19 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson