To: Jacquerie
And did you notice that there is not one mention of any penalty for not complying with the order.
3 posted on
11/30/2010 2:46:57 PM PST by
Revel
To: Revel
Good point, though Canady is regarded as a conservative judge, only one of two among five libtards.
4 posted on
11/30/2010 3:00:38 PM PST by
Jacquerie
(As political boiler pressure builds, democrats tighten the relief valve.)
To: Revel
penalties are for proles, not the political class.
6 posted on
11/30/2010 6:22:21 PM PST by
zeugma
(Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
To: Revel
penalties are for proles, not the political class.
7 posted on
11/30/2010 6:22:35 PM PST by
zeugma
(Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
To: Revel
Yep, that’s right. However, all it’ll take is a few pro se litigants to file criminal charges against officers of the court and the clock begins ticking on fixing that part of the problem.
A few lawyers disbarred and jailed and a judge or two charged, arrested, and handcuffed in their own “courtrooms” or hauled before grand juries for obstruction of justice would make the judiciary ears quickly stand to attention.
9 posted on
11/30/2010 7:22:12 PM PST by
azhenfud
(The government is not best which secures life and property-there is a more valuable thing-manhood.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson