Posted on 11/29/2010 5:27:05 AM PST by justlurking
Facebook has just announced that George W. Bush is going to be present tomorrow November 29th to answer questions about his new book Decision Points. The discussion will happen on Facebook Live at 2PM PST.
It is unclear whether Mark Zuckerberg will be attending the Q&A but its likely. I can only assume that Facebook is the platform for this discussion because of the sheer number of members Bush can reach at one time. There is no mention of who will interview the president and how long it will take but I am sure more information will develop as we get closer to the time frame of the interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at tekgoblin.com ...
Isn’t it predictably hubristic that the pseudo-con, neo-libertarian haters actually think they’re the majority here at FR and, even more delusionally, among the voting electorate . . . bahahahaha!
An open invitation to the Internet — why do I have a bad feeling about this?
You couldn't pay me enough to take the job of finding the worthwhile questions (if any) out of the flood of crap that's bound to roll in.
When you're the TOP BOSS, you don't get points for "trying", you get points for "results".
Libtards are the only ones who go around crying, not wanting anyone to remember their mistakes, and then scream and expect points for "trying".
Bush was the worst Republican President that I know of. I will say that to his face.
At least Nixon, got us out of Vietnam.
I don't do GW, either.
How anyone can sit through all these constant "interviews" and listen to an hour or so of absolutely NOTHING AT ALL is beyond me. Listen closely to him. He's an elephant that labors mightily and delivers a mouse.
He grins and beams and soothes but gives no new insights, propounds no original thoughts, gives no unknown historical perspectives....and dances all around the hard questions.
The "compassionate conservative" facade never slips for a moment. His "interviews" are a waste of what could be productive time.
He avoids anything and everything controversial, citing the "dignity of the presidency"......yet his travelling road show of blatant shilling for money for his book belies this "dignity" pose.....and is reminiscent to me of O'Reilly's never-ending "Bold, Fresh" hucksterism crap.
Other than that, I like ole George.
Leni
Hillary would have been almost as bad as Zero on national policies, and certainly would have pushed many socialist agendas. However, there would not be the Muslim love fest going on in the White House under Hillary's leadership. The only other difference is that she would have been stronger internationally, and retained more respect for the U.S.
So, no, Bush did not lead us to Obama.
The media and left lied and belittled Bush for 8 years
The media lied about Iraq for 6 years
The media overblew Republican "scandals" and ignored Democrat crimes
There was a Democrat caused economic crash, conveniently timed right before the election to do the most damage
McCain, as a candidate, stank
McCain is a RINO without principle
McCain campaigned against Bush but refused to campaign against Obama
The media lied and exalted Obama
The American people were stupid enough to believe the garbage Obama was spouting
The youth of America voted for an American Idol and not a candidate
Everyone, including RINO Republicans refused to admit that Obama was a radical
Billions of illegal foreign dollars were spent on electing Obama
So.......you see, ray. The historical facts are with me and the feelings are with you.
That is really, really, really funny coming from you.
Especially considering your ad hominem, strawman post to which I was responding.
At any rate, the majority of us conservatives still respect President Bush. YOU, sir, are in the minority.
That's almost too silly to even try to make a comment about.
Other than saying, go ahead and say it to his face. He'll probably smile and say, isn't America great that you have the right to say that to him?
He's a good man, and he will be remembered as a strong President.
Thats ridiculous.
“Bush was the worst Republican President that I know of. I will say that to his face”
Not quite, his old man was the worst. Any sitting president that only gets 38% of the vote at reelection proves that the American people agree. No more Bushes, we won’t be fooled again. W stands for wimp.
That said, I did vote for them but look at what the alternatives were.
(They really DO think they're the majority!)
“Ad hominem is the sign of a failed argument (which is ironic, since the charge is “ignorance”).”
The only irony is that someone as ignorant as you thinks they are conservative...W is one of the most conservative presidents we have had. What part of private ownership, reduced taxes, right to life, free trade, etc. etc. etc. do you not get? The man liberated over 50 million people, saved millions of lives in Africa, fought for the sanctity of life at every step. Tried to save retirements for people...wonder where you were on that one. Probably crying about privatizing social security. He did not spend the money, your congressman did...W had a real plateful to deal with and needed congress to work with him...reality is a hard thing to grasp sometimes but for Pete’s sake at least make some kind of intellectual attempt.
How was calling someone a "Bush Lover" ad hominem? I would think that's simply accurate? Or, are you offended by being known as a Bush lover?
Wow. That's even sillier than the post about his being the worst.
Is is a contest to see who can make the dumbest comment about President Bush?
Is there a prize?? LOL!
I’d ask Bush why he let the border and the nation go to hell in the service of the left and why he maintained the traitorous Kosovo policy of Clinton’s -— that of creating another Islamic narco terror state in Europe.
I echo other conservatives -— no more Bushes — ever.
“btw, your premise that Bush led us to Obama is highly flawed and not backed up by historical fact.
Oh, yes it is. You just don’t want to believe it.”
So, are you saying that Bush made you vote and campaign for Obama? What ignorance is expounded here against Bush, it is like the lemmings come out from under their rocks to spew some stupid remarks and then they go back under their rocks hiding from the reality that it is their fault, not Bush’s for what has happened to this country.
Evasion is not our friend ray. Everyone who read your post on both sides of the Bush question knew what you meant.
Besides which, if you call "Bush hater" an ad hominem, then "Bush lover" is equally an ad hominem.
And all I was doing was responding to your gratuitous and stupid original statement.
So in any case, you are guilty and lose the argument.
You forgot barf alert! He screwed conservatives and now we have Obama. Thanks Bush you are a Genius! (sarcasm off)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.