Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanford Airport to opt out of TSA screening
WDBO Local News ^ | November 19, 2010 | Marva Hinton

Posted on 11/27/2010 3:54:38 PM PST by SoCal SoCon

Edited on 11/27/2010 7:16:36 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

The backlash continues over those new TSA screening measures, and now one Central Florida airport has decided to go with a private security screening firm.

Orlando Sanford International Airport has decided to opt out from TSA screening.

"All of our due diligence shows it's the way to go," said Larry Dale, the director of the Sanford Airport Authority. "You're going to get better service at a better price and more accountability and better customer service."

Dale says he will be sending a letter requesting to opt out from TSA screening...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: tsa; tsapervs
If I ever have to travel to a foreign country again, a little detour to central FL first wouldn't be too bad.
1 posted on 11/27/2010 3:54:42 PM PST by SoCal SoCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoCal SoCon

I’ll bet Uncle Janet is steaming over this. What if the private firm comes up with the better way that she said didn’t exist? Can’t have the private sector outdo the public sector. It might make Janet look like a colossal buffoon.

Woops. Too late on that one.


2 posted on 11/27/2010 4:13:19 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport
Who cares if Big Sis is upset. Besides, San Francisco and Kansas City airports have been using private screeners for years. There are dozens who have opted out.

Our local Colorado Springs airport is thinking of ditching the TSA for private screening company. Good move for any town or city.

3 posted on 11/27/2010 4:19:59 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoCal SoCon

Awesome. Funny though I didn’t know that you could opt out of the TSA. Perhaps the TSA pays the way for the security which saves the airports money? If airports can opt out it seriously hurts anyone’s legal arguments for the 4th amendment since the TSA merely becomes a competing security company.


4 posted on 11/27/2010 4:20:53 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

YAY Sanford!


5 posted on 11/27/2010 4:21:03 PM PST by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy

Yep, the deal was after two years any airport could opt out and use Private agencies, which, IMO, they should all do if they want to keep people flying, and hopefully the private agencies will profile.


6 posted on 11/27/2010 4:23:37 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: calex59

The not-so-Justice Department will sue any group that “profiles”.

Watch Sanford’s new security firm to have the entire government thrown at them.

Chicago thugs work like that.


7 posted on 11/27/2010 4:25:58 PM PST by american_ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yes, yay Sanford. Several good things come out of Sanford (beaming)


8 posted on 11/27/2010 4:55:15 PM PST by Shimmer1 (Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. - MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

No names, please!


9 posted on 11/27/2010 5:04:57 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 676 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoCal SoCon

Keep in mind that the private firm has to follow ALL the TSA requirements and procedures. The fines assessed if they are caught not doing so are pretty heavy. And they will be watched.

FYI, TSA fines for “violations” by the private security firm are levied on the firm *AND* the individual employee who makes the error in following procedure.

So, don’t get too ecstatic. It may be the best that can be hoped for here is that the security employees will be less arrogant.


10 posted on 11/27/2010 5:13:20 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

And only 30 miles from my house!!


11 posted on 11/27/2010 5:28:05 PM PST by mcmuffin ( . )( . ) (We're watching you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

True, but what if someone sued one of the private security agents for sexual assault? It might have a different outcome than if someone were to sue a TSA agent. Any Freeper lawyers care to weigh in on this one?


12 posted on 11/27/2010 5:29:28 PM PST by SoCal SoCon (Liberals whine. Conservatives act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoCal SoCon

They will see their passenger traffic increase.

I hope all other airports that want to remain fiscally sound and competitive will consider kicking out TSA and putting in private screeners who do not employ zero-tolerance non-profiling.

First though we need to check the stock of Mappy and see she doesn’t own a bunch of private security screeners.


13 posted on 11/27/2010 5:36:06 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcmuffin

I lived in Sanford for 10 years and worked for Seminole County as a Traffic Engineer. Larry Dale used to be (not sure if he still is) a developer and me and him butted heads many times. He also always won because my supers and commissioners would always cave. He is a very stubborn man. If anyone is willing to stand up to Barry and his TSA cronies, it will be Mr. Dale. Will continue to monitor this story.


14 posted on 11/27/2010 6:25:28 PM PST by tnphelps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoCal SoCon
Sanford is dissing Obama's latest directive? Obama's liable to send in the big guns and force Sanford to capitulate:


15 posted on 11/27/2010 7:41:51 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Nice. So it makes sense to me. Airports that opt out should see a big uptick in traffic and airports that have a decrease will suffer until they get rid of the TSA. If people stop flying all together in big enough numbers the airlines will push the airport authorities to opt out or they will shut down flights.


16 posted on 11/27/2010 8:01:00 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1; null and void
Yes, yay Sanford. Several good things come out of Sanford (beaming)

Sorry. You've been outed.


17 posted on 11/27/2010 11:11:24 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What's black and white and red all over? HINT: Think White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson