Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If I ever have to travel to a foreign country again, a little detour to central FL first wouldn't be too bad.
1 posted on 11/27/2010 3:54:42 PM PST by SoCal SoCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoCal SoCon

I’ll bet Uncle Janet is steaming over this. What if the private firm comes up with the better way that she said didn’t exist? Can’t have the private sector outdo the public sector. It might make Janet look like a colossal buffoon.

Woops. Too late on that one.


2 posted on 11/27/2010 4:13:19 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal SoCon

Awesome. Funny though I didn’t know that you could opt out of the TSA. Perhaps the TSA pays the way for the security which saves the airports money? If airports can opt out it seriously hurts anyone’s legal arguments for the 4th amendment since the TSA merely becomes a competing security company.


4 posted on 11/27/2010 4:20:53 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal SoCon

Keep in mind that the private firm has to follow ALL the TSA requirements and procedures. The fines assessed if they are caught not doing so are pretty heavy. And they will be watched.

FYI, TSA fines for “violations” by the private security firm are levied on the firm *AND* the individual employee who makes the error in following procedure.

So, don’t get too ecstatic. It may be the best that can be hoped for here is that the security employees will be less arrogant.


10 posted on 11/27/2010 5:13:20 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal SoCon

They will see their passenger traffic increase.

I hope all other airports that want to remain fiscally sound and competitive will consider kicking out TSA and putting in private screeners who do not employ zero-tolerance non-profiling.

First though we need to check the stock of Mappy and see she doesn’t own a bunch of private security screeners.


13 posted on 11/27/2010 5:36:06 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal SoCon
Sanford is dissing Obama's latest directive? Obama's liable to send in the big guns and force Sanford to capitulate:


15 posted on 11/27/2010 7:41:51 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson