The new treatment is the latest in a long string of hundreds of successes in the science of stem cell treatments that use mature cells rather than embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cell treatments, which destroy a human life, have never been proven effective in any medical treatment to date. And that is why the mainstream media will NEVER report this.
1 posted on
11/27/2010 2:02:32 PM PST by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on
11/27/2010 2:03:10 PM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
3 posted on
11/27/2010 2:03:58 PM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
A B^U^M^P!
Also a THANK YOU to God and a prayer for this thread to grow as it should here on FREE REPUBLIC!!!!!!!!
4 posted on
11/27/2010 2:07:49 PM PST by
AKA Elena
(St Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle -- and this is war!)
To: wagglebee
This bears repeating and repeating!!!!!!!
The new treatment is the latest in a long string of hundreds of successes in the science of stem cell treatments that use mature cells rather than embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cell treatments, which destroy a human life, have never been proven effective in any medical treatment to date.
5 posted on
11/27/2010 2:12:48 PM PST by
AKA Elena
(St Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle -- and this is war!)
To: wagglebee
A 35 year old friend had leukemia. They gave him his brothers’ cells. It worked. He has curly hair now....like his brother.
To: wagglebee
For all the FR Bush-bashers, just remember how he was continually ridiculed for being anti-science because of his stance on embryonic stem cell research.
The man at least needs to get the credit he deserves.
To: wagglebee
My father in law was successfully treated and cured of Mantel cell Lymphoma using his own blood stem cells.
Praise God!
8 posted on
11/27/2010 2:18:08 PM PST by
RedMDer
(Forward With Confidence!)
To: wagglebee
Link no workee.
My wife died at 28 from breast cancer and I follow cancer advances very close. I have always believed the cure would be based on our body’s natural system - i.e. stem cells in cord blood.
I am waiting for Imam Obozo to loudly denounce his previous stance on the slaughter of life...... (cue crickets...)
11 posted on
11/27/2010 2:28:28 PM PST by
newfreep
(Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
To: wagglebee
Yes. The media are so desperate to legitimize abortions that they will predictably cover this up. And leftist governments will refuse to fund it.
Never mind that many lives could be saved, patients like this girl as well as babies. That doesn’t matter to those ideologues. Not in the least.
14 posted on
11/27/2010 2:39:05 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius.)
To: wagglebee
And, you can get a lot more stem cells from an umbilical cord than you can from an embryo.
15 posted on
11/27/2010 2:46:01 PM PST by
reg45
To: wagglebee
16 posted on
11/27/2010 2:55:37 PM PST by
i_dont_chat
("The Jihadists are coming!" "The Jihadists are coming!" In my best Paul Revere imitation.)
To: wagglebee
Excellent news! I wonder how one goes about saving their child’s umbilical cord. The cost. Where it’s kept, etc. If this is doable for people financially, it sure seems a great idea.
18 posted on
11/27/2010 2:58:32 PM PST by
mlizzy
(Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee ...)
To: wagglebee
the girl was 4 at the time of treatment. How could they preserve the cord cells for 4 years? The fact that nothing is said about it makes me suspicious of this article.
22 posted on
11/27/2010 3:42:20 PM PST by
1955Ford
To: wagglebee
Sorry, I hadn’t read the preceding posts, which answered my question
23 posted on
11/27/2010 3:46:59 PM PST by
1955Ford
To: wagglebee
WebMD has some straight talk on saving cord blood
http://www.webmd.com/baby/should-i-bank-my-babys-umbilical-cord-blood#tn10338
They say that cord blood banks oversell their services, that cord blood is useful in only a tiny number of cases.
They say that a child with leukemia shouldn’t use her own cord blood cells because they may have the same genetic defect that caused leukemia in the first place.
26 posted on
11/27/2010 4:16:34 PM PST by
1955Ford
To: wagglebee
This miraculous cure required the deaths of exactly zero children.
Go back and do it again until it starts requiring infanticide, or it will never get Federal funding or media attention.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
27 posted on
11/27/2010 4:24:10 PM PST by
The Comedian
(Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
To: wagglebee
Thank you, God, for this provision!! Wow, I can’t wait to see what the future holds for these cells.
29 posted on
11/27/2010 4:48:30 PM PST by
Reddy
(B.O. stinks)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
30 posted on
11/27/2010 5:17:20 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson