Posted on 11/27/2010 2:40:03 AM PST by rxsid
"Supremes challenged to put Constitution above Twitter
Case questioning eligibility says facts don't support Obama story
The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether the Constitution will trump Twitter on issues of national importance, including the eligibility of a president, which could determine the very future of the American form of government.
The request is being made in a petition for writ of certiori, or a request for the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower appellate court, in a case brought on behalf of Col. Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force officer.
...
The pleadings submitted to the court, compiled by longtime attorney John D. Hemenway, cite the incredible importance of the claims that Obama, in fact, failed to qualify for the office.
"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," states the pleading.
"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued. "
Continued: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=233177
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Our lifetime appointed shuffleboard team won’t tip over the apple cart.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/2008_DNC_Certification_Doc_2.jpg
and
http://www.canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/2008_DNC_Certification_Doc_1.jpg
looks like Nany faked the Electorial college declaration.
Since Sotomayor and Kagan are creatures of Obama, is it proper for them to recuse themselves from the vote? Thus leaving seven justices to decide?
To paraphrase Bush 43: If ya ain’t with us, you’re against us.
8^D
5.56mm
Anyone know the answer to this one? If the individual states pass laws stating that all presidential candidates must prove their citizenship by producing their birth certificate in order to be placed on that state’s ballot (I think Texas has recently passed such a law), how will 0bama get around it? Will his fake birth certificate be quietly accepted?
EVERY Executive Order would also be invalid.
FORBIDDEN??!
Sometimes in 2009 after the so called "inauguration"(?) they all went AWOL on this special issue, probably getting marching orders to sweep it under the rug..."or else(?)..."!
Jack Maskell got to Congress effectively but fraudulently!!
John Roberts and seven others judges got a "nice friendly" visit on January 14, 2009 telegraphing the "message" to the lower courts. IIRC I think there were some threats out in the Mid-West before the election, if any negatives were voiced, they would be prosecuted, hmmm!!!
All that and more is WHY we have a real Constitutional crisis right now!!!
Will his fake birth certificate be quietly accepted?
I guess that is really up to us.
Not a chance. Liberals, especially liberal judges, see themselves as Olypian gods, above the fray, incapable of bias, error, or human frailty.
The wise Latina will stay on the case, vote to dismiss, and stand to pee.
Clouseaus French accent became steadily more exaggerated in successive films (for example, pronouncing "room" as "reum"; "Pope" as "Peup"; "bomb" as "beumb"; and "bumps" as "beumps").
LMAO!!
The wise Latrina...
8^D
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2633216/posts?page=88#88
This is the future that the Court sees for America
Remember this?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2633346/posts?page=9#9
Don’t get your hopes up too high.
I don't recall reading this in any of the other articles on the subject.
The Constitution requires a President to not only be a citizen , but also be a Natural born citizen . IF obama was born in Hawaii( unlikely) then he is a citizen( 14th amendment) but is not a Natural Born Citizen as required by the Constitution. Any certificate supplied by obama must show that BOTH of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth. This is the reason he refuses to release his birth records. His birth certificate is legal proof that he is not the legal President of the U.S.
Joseph Farah has finally found an audience, and has no intention of letting go of it. Wonder what his ad revenue is like at WND?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.