Skip to comments.
Bobby Jindal's Downside (Jindal as POTUS? Take a closer look at his record as Louisiana governor)
American Thinker ^
| 11/26/2010
| Tom Roberson
Posted on 11/26/2010 6:35:19 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal is busy promoting his new tome Leadership and Crisis with book tour stops all over the country. This latest tour comes on top of his previous speaking tours to raise campaign cash for himself and various Republican candidates around the country. The only place Governor Jindal has trouble visiting is his home state of Louisiana. The joke in Louisiana is that Bobby is known as a governor in 49 states.
Governor Jindal is intelligent and very well-educated, and he manages to look like a creditable leader during a crisis. In this he learned well from former Governor Kathleen Blanco's disastrous handling of the Hurricane Katrina aftermath. He can spout numerous statistics off the top of his head and make complicated situations understandable.
However, as we've learned from the current occupant of the White House, command of statistics and the ability to explain the complicated do not necessarily indicate that one is destined to be a great leader.
Louisiana's last budget was
balanced with numerous
accounting tricks, one-time funding sources, and massive cuts to
health and
higher education. Jindal has been criticized for pushing hard decisions down the road to avoid offending anyone in preparation for a presidential bid, and it is well-known in Louisiana that Jindal is preparing to run and campaigning across the country on trips
funded by Louisiana taxpayers.
Louisiana is a populist state that tends to overspend in flush times and flail in lean times. In Louisiana, health and higher education are not constitutionally protected from budget cuts and are routinely savaged when the economy dives. To be fair, there is a great deal of waste in higher education that needs to be eliminated, and LSU professors are not helping their cause by threatening to
unionize in a state where unions are not looked on favorably. Also, LSU System President Dr. John Lombardi, Louisiana's highest-paid state employee, recently
refused to trim his salary for the good of the school and further exposed the hypocrisy in Louisiana higher education.
During Jindal's administration, Louisiana has
added over 3,100 new employees, and its budget has increased from $12 billion in 2008 to $24 billion in
2010. The governor seems to think this surge in state government will somehow conquer the budget in the long run.
When it comes to cutting spending, the governor can't cut even his own travel budget. One of Governor Jindal's favorite Louisiana campaign tactics is local church attendance by
helicopter in rural areas rarely visited by any governor.
Jindal's celebrated ethics legislation promoting transparency in Louisiana government has
backfired (see also
here): it has been revealed that enforcement powers were
stripped from the Ethics Board, resulting in several
resignations in protest, and Jindal has zealously
guarded the records of the governor's office from the light of day. The law's most notable accomplishment has been to drive worthy citizens away from serving on state boards by requiring draconian disclosures of every conceivable financial detail and close association in a futile effort to prevent political corruption. Are you kidding? This is Louisiana!
Governor Jindal devotes a
sizable portion of
Leadership and Crisis to detailing Louisiana's natural beauty, recounting political anecdotes, and listing boilerplate conservative talking points without ever mentioning his plans to deal with the state's looming $1.5-billion budget shortfall or the numerous challenges faced by Louisiana as its graduates flee in search of opportunities the state can't provide.
Jindal doesn't seem to understand is that status quo governing is currently not in vogue. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is talked about as presidential material precisely because of his willingness to shake up New Jersey's insular political culture without thought of higher office. Christie is willing to take on the special interests and make the hard choices New Jersey needs to survive, while Jindal is doing his best not to offend any powerful interests in Louisiana. This type of timid leadership is exactly what the Tea Parties are railing against.
Those promoting or considering Bobby Jindal as presidential material need to take a much closer look at his record as Louisiana governor. Jindal talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk.
Hat tip: C.B. Forgotston
Tom Roberson is an independent conservative holding finance and engineering degrees and doing his small part to save his country.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobbyjindal; louisiana; president; smear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: Artemis Webb
You believe what you want. I live here in Louisiana and have so for sixty years. I’m immersed in Louisiana politics every day as a working reporter.
Jindal IS NOT the real deal.
You have been warned.
21
posted on
11/26/2010 6:56:17 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: SeekAndFind
Hes not a natural born citizenWell anyone can check his bio and see that he was born here of (legal) immigrant parents.
To: SeekAndFind
President James Garfield:
U.S. House of Representatives March 4, 1863 March 3, 1881
President of the United States on March 4, 1881
23
posted on
11/26/2010 6:57:16 AM PST
by
sitetest
( If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: SeekAndFind
Ever notice that so many who rag on Jindal, Palin, Rand Paul, Christine O’Donnell, et. al., call themselves “conservatives”—??
I think it’s the latest ploy to make sure some sure-fire loser like Mitt Romney ends up nominated.
24
posted on
11/26/2010 6:57:37 AM PST
by
PaleoBob
To: SeekAndFind
Louisiana's last budget was balanced with numerous accounting tricks, one-time funding sources, and massive cuts to health and higher educationWhy do you cut health care and higher education?
How about because that is where the money is. In tough times I don't starve my kids while I make the payments on my Lamborghini - well upon second thought.
To: AndyJackson
Well anyone can check his bio and see that he was born here of (legal) immigrant parents. There are those who believe that for a person to be a natural born citizen then both parents must be citizens. Jindal's parents were not citizens when he was born.
To: abb
I know Tom Robertson and hes a friend of mine. He knows whereof he speaks about Jindal.
Yes, hes done a decent enough job as a supposed conservative here in Louisiana. But it wasnt because Jindal has deep-down conservative convictions.
Jindal did the conservative thing because there were some folks - talk radio host Moon Griffon chief among them - who stood over him with a baseball bat and MADE him do it.
Your “friend” needs to get a grip on what being a “conservative” is. Maybe he should go back and read Goldwater. To complain because a governor cut spending on education and health care and then call himself a conservative....
Look, you tell you bud-bud there that if budgets are EVER gonna be balanced health care and education will endure cuts.
Conservatives don’t COMPLAIN about cuts. They demand more.
27
posted on
11/26/2010 7:01:18 AM PST
by
PaleoBob
To: SeekAndFind
Let’s just save everyone the trouble and make a list of the top ten potential Republican presidental candidates and have an associated “truth file” so we can torpedo each and every one of them before the campaign even starts.
Hooray for Obama in 2012!
28
posted on
11/26/2010 7:01:31 AM PST
by
flintsilver7
(Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
To: SeekAndFind
During Jindal's administration, Louisiana has added over 3,100 new employees, and its budget has increased from $12 billion in 2008 to $24 billion in 2010.
I don't know all the details, but on its face that doesn't look like fiscal reponsibility to me....
29
posted on
11/26/2010 7:02:57 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
(Hey now!)
To: PaleoBob
As I said upthread, Jindal IS NOT the real deal. He is a Big-Government Republican.
You too have been warned.
30
posted on
11/26/2010 7:03:15 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: sitetest
Him, too
31
posted on
11/26/2010 7:04:02 AM PST
by
Zakeet
(Like the wise Wee Wee said, "We can't be broke ... we still have checks in the checkbook.")
To: SeekAndFind
I have not ever known a person who has gone directly from the House to the Presidency... We see with the current occupant of the Whitehouse that someone with only legislative experience isn't up to the challenges of managing the Executive Branch on a daily basis. Whether or not someone has ascended from the House to the Presidency doesn't bother me as much as making sure whoever does become the next POTUS has actual, hands on management experience, preferably running a business and making a payroll, not just experience compromising in a legislative atmosphere. We need someone who is decisive and can think on their feet. Not someone who will defer to a committee or a "blue ribbon commission" to avoid responsibility for their actions, as is all too typical for people who come from the Legislative Branch of gubmint.
32
posted on
11/26/2010 7:04:53 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
To: SeekAndFind
What is going on?
I keep reading articles by people who are supposedly conservatives knocking down potential conservative Presidential candidates one-by-one.
This morning there is no shortage of Sarah Palin criticism. I heard Newt Gingrich slammed this morning. Now Bobby Jindahl.
What gives? I didn’t think I was reading a left wing forum here.
33
posted on
11/26/2010 7:06:26 AM PST
by
RoadTest
(Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
To: Zakeet; SeekAndFind
Dear Zakeet,
Although you're correct that the highest office held by President Lincoln prior to his election to the presidency was that of US Representative, the previous poster had phrased the criterion thusly:
“I have not ever known a person who has gone directly from the House to the Presidency... does anyone know if we have such a precedent?”
Mr. Lincoln wasn't serving in the House of Representatives at the time of his election to the presidency.
sitetest
34
posted on
11/26/2010 7:08:09 AM PST
by
sitetest
( If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: RoadTest
It’s the Free Republic way. It happened in 2000, it happened in 2008, and it will happen again in 2012. Every single Republican candidate will be torpedoed until we’re left with a sad sack like McCain with no chance of winning.
35
posted on
11/26/2010 7:08:38 AM PST
by
flintsilver7
(Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
To: samtheman
The GOP Elites are pushing Romney as the
it's his turn guy.
If he fails early (like Guiliani in 08), look for Jeb Bush to be their
go to candidate because Gingrich has too much old baggage.
They already think of the Tea Party like they have the conservative wing in the past:
They will go with our candidate; where else are they going to go? Obama?
36
posted on
11/26/2010 7:10:00 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: AndyJackson
Legal immigrants are not citizens until naturalized.
When Jindal was born his parents were not yet naturalized.
Therefore, he is not natural born. He is native born, because he was born in the United States.
One unnaturally born President is already one too many.
37
posted on
11/26/2010 7:10:53 AM PST
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: flintsilver7
...were left with a sad sack like McCain with no chance of winning. It was McCain's turn. The Republicans have a long history of nominating "the next guy in line". Nixon, Ford, GHW Bush, Dole and McCain are all examples. The Republican establishment doesn't want a Conservative at the top. The only real stand out in the past 40 years is Ronald Reagan. The country clubbers couldn't stop him, but they sure tried, didn't they?
38
posted on
11/26/2010 7:14:39 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
To: samtheman
What are the “problems” with Pence?
39
posted on
11/26/2010 7:21:38 AM PST
by
Running On Empty
((The three sorriest words: "It's too late"))
To: Thermalseeker
They will always try, I believe, and unfortunately they are aided by people who push their candidates. There are many of those here. In 2008, in my mind the two best candidates from an ideological perspective were Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson. Hunter had little to no name recognition and was not the best debater. Fred Thompson would’ve been great, I think, but the fact of the matter is the guy just didn’t want the job. He had to be pushed into it. We were really left with Giuliani, Huckabee, Romney, and McCain. All were flawed candidates, but we ended up with the absolute worst of the bunch.
It will probably happen again in 2012. I wish it weren’t true. The country-club types will probably want to nominate the “his turn” guy, which I think is Romney. There are a bunch of candidates that are much better, of course, but people here who dislike Jindal (abb in particular has been complaining about him for years) will try their best to torpedo him before hand. Pence, Allen, and whoever else might be running will inevitably have dozens of detractors here who will ultimately help Romney.
40
posted on
11/26/2010 7:22:38 AM PST
by
flintsilver7
(Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson