Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No ‘junk touching’ in Canada, Transport Minister says
The Globe and Mail ^ | November 24, 2010 | Jane Taber, Senior Political Writer

Posted on 11/24/2010 10:35:58 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

The burgeoning “don’t touch my junk” movement in the United States has prompted the Harper government to quietly request the installation of special privacy dividers at security lanes in Canada’s major airports.

The physical search stalls are beginning to appear now, in time for the peak holiday travel season. The U.S. backlash against intrusive searches prompted the Conservative government to act.

Transport Minister Chuck Strahl announced the new privacy measure in Question Period on Wednesday.

He insisted, however, the government will not institute aggressive U.S.-style pat-downs. He also said the full body-scan machines Canada is using “do not pose the same health risk [as those in the United States] because they use a millimetre wave technology rather than X-ray technology.”

“So passenger security is extremely important, and our government is committed to balancing that by ensuring that passengers are treated respectfully and properly,” he said.

Important – and seemingly, comical.

“People touch my private parts all day long,” Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff told reporters when asked about the U.S. situation and Mr. Strahl’s announcement.

Mr. Ignatieff noted that his job requires that he practically live in airports, and he accepts the security measures.

“That’s what we have to do to keep us safe. ... I have long ceased worrying about these issues,” he said. “We have to keep this country safe and the people I feel strongly in support of are the hard-working security scanners. It’s not a great job. It’s tough. You’re wearing rubber gloves all day long.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theglobeandmail.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canada; patdowns; security; tsa; tsapervs; tsascanners; wot
So even Canada does this better than we do, not just Israel?
1 posted on 11/24/2010 10:36:04 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ya know any other country that has Barry Soetoro squatting in the people’s house ???


2 posted on 11/24/2010 10:40:36 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I read the other day that in Canada Muslim veiled women go right through without even being ID’d or anything else.


3 posted on 11/24/2010 10:40:50 PM PST by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

JEWELS!!

NOT "junk"

Whatever happened to the "family jewels"? So much more appealing than trash.

4 posted on 11/24/2010 11:28:46 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I agree. Calling your private parts your “junk” just sounds dumb and low-class.


5 posted on 11/24/2010 11:44:20 PM PST by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The sand trash is costing us billions and we are losing our freedom because of them. Why in the name of all that is good are we allowing them into our country? How about charging airlines that fly into and out of islamic hell holes a 5,000% duty on those flights to pay for this frivolous BS? Why are we being ripped off? No more rag heads on airplanes. Problem solved.


6 posted on 11/25/2010 12:21:59 AM PST by coon2000 (Give me Liberty or give me death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kelly4c

“Calling your private parts your “junk” just sounds dumb and low-class.”

On the other hand that “junk” is producing the most government dependant, low class leeches this country has ever known. Maybe it is approriate for many.


7 posted on 11/25/2010 4:49:54 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Michael Ignatieff believes me must surrender our liberty for safety. Those who take that position deserve neither benefit. Canada’s Liberal Party is sadly misnamed. There is no principle among men today, only gutless cowardice that passes for reasoned thought among them.


8 posted on 11/25/2010 4:58:15 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“People touch my private parts all day long,” Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff told reporters when asked about the U.S. situation and Mr. Strahl’s announcement.

What!?

Mr. Ignatieff noted that his job requires that he practically live in airports, and he accepts the security measures.

Double what!?

So being opposition leader requires he hang around airports and have people touch his privates all day oO, hope someone saves these gems for the next elections.
9 posted on 11/25/2010 4:45:36 PM PST by battousai (Conservatives are racist? YES, I hate stupid white liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson