I don't want anybody stupid enough to buy into that sort of bullshit in my political party, the dems can have him.
This debate is over as far as conservatives are concerned. The only debate left is how long the liberals want to look like IDIOTS and keep pushing this garbage.
glad he is a former GOP congressman...
“I call on my fellow Republicans to open their minds to rethinking..”
I stopped reading after that..
Who knew the Washington Post had a section where the mentally ill and cognitively challenged could write for one another?!!!
Where’s the barf alert?
No Sherwood its bad science that is being rejected!
Why did they have to fake the data?
Ole Sherwood says “hide the decline”
Well Sherwood, wese jes too dumb to understand the facts and science behind dat fancy global warming. We stupid folk think its all a socialist power grab hiding behind Americans’ good feelings toward nature. I guess if we was smart like you, we’d know shutting down the factories is good for us. We could all be government workers and the environment would be safe.
This douchenozzle is scamming to protect his job since he can’t seem to get reelected. The lying data faking b’strd hasn’t discovered that he is being dumped by his own leaders as they admit, “It ain’t about climate change, it’s about trying to redistribute wealth [to them].”
If they won’t substantively acknowledge the corruption revealed by the CRU emails, why should anyone listen to another tone-deaf liberal bleating about AGW?
Hey Sherwood!
How about taking a nice long walk off of a real short pier!
That ought to cool you down!
Bjorn Lomborg (”Can Anything Serious Happen in Cancun?”, op-ed, Nov. 12) claims that government spending on global warming policies is wasted, but he assumes that global warming caused by carbon dioxide is a fact. It is not. We base this statement not on the opinions of 31,000 American scientists who signed a public statement rejecting this warming hypothesis (the “Oregon Petition”), but rather because the forecasts of global warming were derived from faulty procedures.
We published a peer-reviewed paper showing that the forecasting procedures used by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change violated 72 of 89 relevant principles (e.g., “provide full disclosure of methods”). The IPCC has been unable to explain why it violated such principles. In response, we developed a model that follows the principles. Because the climate is complex and poorly understood, our model predicts that global average temperatures will not change.
In testing the models on global temperature data since 1850, we found that the long-range (91-to-100-years ahead) forecast errors from the IPCC’s projection were 12 times larger than the errors from our simple model.
Mr. Lomborg concludes there are better ways for governments to spend the funds devoted to global warming. We suggest this money should instead be returned to taxpayers.
J. Scott Armstrong
The Wharton School
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Man’s activities don’t change climate. Climate has never been static, and it never will be. Selfgrandizing oneself into god status is a disease of the left. There is no science, only opinion when it comes to the issue of global warming because man has not even been able to determine how much rain falls to earth and/or on the water daily. Studies leave out the influence of the sun as if it was no be deal. Climate change is a tool of those wanting to dictate wealth distribution. Thank goodness there are people pushing back.
Yes Sherwood - and the moon is made of green cheese too...
You know, I don't know what is worse - being ignorant of geology, anthropology, oceanography and history, or calling this transparent fraud "science".
100 000 years ago, my home was in a savanna. 10 000 years ago, it was under two miles of ice.
Before humans did anything of consequence, temperatures rose 18-20 degrees Celsius, all that ice melted, and the oceans rose 400 feet.
To believe that trivial (if they even exist at all) late temperature variations are human induced, while all those massive historical changes occurred on their own is just, just - IGNORANT.
Moron. Useful idiot. Dupe. Buh-bye!