[aruanan]

So the California video either depicts the world's longest burning and slowest accelerating rocket, or it depicts evidence of hurricane force winds without an accompanying storm.

Or it depicts a contrail from a jet that is being affected at different points (gaps and lateral displacement) by the same meteorological forces that are producing clouds or no clouds at those same points. But that's not as exciting an explanation as a mystery possibly Chinese sub-launched potentially nuclear missile that defies all known facts about missiles and their flight characteristics unless it was a high altitude cruise missile powered by jet turbines and then--hey, wait, a jet aircraft leaving a contrail is, literally, a missile cruising at high altitude.

So how many days in a row can you see the same phenomenon at the same time in the same place and is the regularity more easily explained by a scheduled jet flight or by a Chinese sub mysteriously launching high altitude cruise missiles? And, after having publicly and vociferously committed himself to the mystery sub-launched, atypically-flying rocket-powered missile theory, how willing is someone to accede to a prosaic explanation and admit he was wrong?

[Rokke]

"...how willing is someone to accede to a prosaic explanation and admit he was wrong?"

I believe that will be the last question regarding this incident to be answered. And I'm not going to hold my breath.

[TigersEye]

Or it depicts a contrail from a jet that is being affected at different points (gaps and lateral displacement) by the same meteorological forces that are producing clouds or no clouds at those same points. But is completely absent in the satellite pic of the same contrail.

[TigersEye]

So how many days in a row does the Pentagon launch an investigation into an airplane contrail that happens every day?

[TigersEye]

I never said anything about any Chinese subs or Chinese missiles.