To: aruanan
Or it depicts a contrail from a jet that is being affected at different points (gaps and lateral displacement) by the same meteorological forces that are producing clouds or no clouds at those same points. But is completely absent in the satellite pic of the same contrail.
379 posted on
11/25/2010 11:41:36 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
To: TigersEye
But is completely absent in the satellite pic of the same contrail.
When was the satellite pic taken and from how far away? Distance and resolution (look at Doris Day close-ups) can obscure otherwise readily apparent details. If is the same contrail then the explanation for what is apparent as a detail in a photo taken from a relatively closer vantage point that does not appear in another photo must lie in the differences in conditions between the two photo sources. And please don't start in a Barney Fife-toned explanation of, "Well, we all know that military satellites can read the cancer-warning on a pack of cigarettes from an altitude of 90 miles so they should have no trouble at all with something a big as a contrail."
388 posted on
11/25/2010 11:59:43 PM PST by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson