[Rokke]

“In the following two pics you can see the “contrail at 37,000 ft.” in front of the low-level marine haze on the ocean.”

Actually, in both pics you can see the contrail never even “touches” the ocean (the flat and slightly darker horizon line). And I have yet to read any explanation for the very obvious spreading of the “missile plume” at its “lowest” point. Was there some massive southerly wind that was strong enough to spread a missile trail miles across the horizon within just a few minutes of its creation? Keep in mind that the supposed missile is still producing exhaust. Not even the Space Shuttle main rocket engines burn longer than 8 minutes, and by that time the Space Shuttle is traveling at 27 times the speed of sound and has left the Earth's atmosphere. So the California video either depicts the world's longest burning and slowest accelerating rocket, or it depicts evidence of hurricane force winds without an accompanying storm.

[TigersEye]

There is “contrail” in front of the haze. The horizon of the ocean is not visible at all in either pic. So, we have a contrail at 39k appearing in front of low-level marine haze.

[aruanan]

So the California video either depicts the world's longest burning and slowest accelerating rocket, or it depicts evidence of hurricane force winds without an accompanying storm.

Or it depicts a contrail from a jet that is being affected at different points (gaps and lateral displacement) by the same meteorological forces that are producing clouds or no clouds at those same points. But that's not as exciting an explanation as a mystery possibly Chinese sub-launched potentially nuclear missile that defies all known facts about missiles and their flight characteristics unless it was a high altitude cruise missile powered by jet turbines and then--hey, wait, a jet aircraft leaving a contrail is, literally, a missile cruising at high altitude.

So how many days in a row can you see the same phenomenon at the same time in the same place and is the regularity more easily explained by a scheduled jet flight or by a Chinese sub mysteriously launching high altitude cruise missiles? And, after having publicly and vociferously committed himself to the mystery sub-launched, atypically-flying rocket-powered missile theory, how willing is someone to accede to a prosaic explanation and admit he was wrong?

[TigersEye]

You mean like this shuttle launch video where it appears to be going pretty slow and the contrail is twisted, broken up and widening fairly fast at the base in less than two minutes?

Space Shuttle Launch. View from commercial flight!

Of course TXnMA says he proved there are only 12 seconds of actual Sky2 video so where you get 8 minutes is another mystery.