The problem with your drift theory is that the plane barely moves forward in this multiple overlay while the contrail moves a lot. That doesn't make sense.
Posted on 11/20/2010 11:34:24 PM PST by JohnKinAK
Glenn Beck said today that he has spoken to military experts about the mystery contrail from a few weeks ago and he says it’s definitely not a plane, but rather a two stage missile. He just wants to know where it came from, and he has a theory. Beck postulates that this missile was possibly from a Chinese sub off the coast of California, perhaps as a show of force to the world, but even more so to President Obama.
Click link for video
IF you go to contrailscience.com they have the images that show the wind was indeed blowing the contrail that day pretyt good, also the satellite weather imagery showed the same thing.
I won’t argue with someone who is only a private pilot and goes to websites to get their info. I know what it was from first hand/actual experience with multiple stage missles. Not only did I watch my missle launches from the ground, I also watched them through no less than three camera angles and sometimes another angle that was classified. Shout all you want to, but it does not make you correct. Also, your pet website only “nails it dead on” because that is what you want to believe. Also, I am a private pilot and that doesn’t make anyone an expert on the sky just because we fly in them. You stick to your “expertise” and I will stick with my actual/practical experience. You don’t even know who is behind your website, and you seem awful quick to believe what the government wants you to believe.
It boils down to what is the most rational and logical explaination.
My own eyes have seen all the elements of this illusion before.
I don’t know how I can get that through to you folks.
I have seen this kind of thing before ok?
My own eyes told me it was an aircraft upon first viewing of the video, i recognized the elements of this illusion quickly because I have seen it before.
I have seen everything at contrailscience.com but your linky no worky. I get a blank page after several refreshes.
Then you must accept a massive unpredendented coverup has occured involving dozens of agencys, thousands of people that coordinated within hours.
Do you accept that you must agree to the above for this to be a rocket launch?
Well the sites down then, try the cached view on google.
The problem with your drift theory is that the plane barely moves forward in this multiple overlay while the contrail moves a lot. That doesn't make sense.
Your video has been debunked as being from the same day. Either that, or the exact same clouds were in the same area at the same time. Why do you people want to believe and trust the government so fast? You are the scary people.
The final image also includes UPS902's track as supplied by FlightAware.com and the FAA.
Why is the track of UPS902, as supplied by FlightAware.com, perpendicular to the path of the contrail?
Most of the contrial is very far over the ocean to beyond the horizon, i’ts had a lot of time to blow south.
You also get wind shears at altitude, that can easily move a contrail quickly, especially if an aircraft is descending or climbing through different shear zones.
It’s an aircraft folks.
There is no mystery, there is no rocket.
Even the plane is blowing south. Faster than it is moving forward from the look of those pics.
Earlier, at 5:19, Rick Warren takes this image from his 10th floor balcony in Long Beach
He took several more photos, at different zoom levels, but all from the same position. You can clearly see the plane as it stops leaving a contrail.
Those two photos are clearly NOT taken from the same location OR the clouds moved quite a bit from one shot to the next. If the cloud moved a lot why didn't the vehicle leaving the contrail move significantly as well?
The second pic is obviously taken a little later than the first as the lighting of the sunset shows. But the vehicle is in the same approximate position and a good deal of the contrail has disappeared. The answer is simple. The vehicle is traveling away from the photographer to the west at a severe angle as the photographer thought. Even a slow moving aircraft would have moved significantly more in the frame if it were coming towards the photographer to the east. As both UPS and flight 808 were supposed to be doing.
Aircraft adjust for wind to keep the proper ground track.
The aicraft continued to make a short contrail, simply conditions were not longer such that it would persist.
The lingering contrail is totally dominated by the predominate winds.
It’s an aircraft.
There are plenty of pictures on that site of other “rockets”.
And guess what it’s going to happen again.
I promise you. When conditions are right, a “rocket” will be seen again. You can bank on it.
Will there be a news chopper video crew to hype it again?
Probably not.
We have a storm front moving through right now, so perhaps it will occur again soon.
LOL...from the man who calls MLK a conservative...
Really? When was the last time that the Pentagon did a thorough investigation of an airplane contrail because a TV station aired film of one?
GB is off his meds...a rocket could not launch in that busy airspace in broad daylight off the CA coast w/o thousands of witnesses...
The front that was moving through CA on Nov. 8th had reached the east slope of the Rockies at the time Sky2 made its video. I know, I was outside watching the humidity of it come down in white flakes. How is it that the conditions for a contrail quit in the video?
It was a transition zone between the pacific ocean and land perhaps and the air changed temperature aloft.
You see this happen everywhere, aicraft fly out of a zone that produces lasting contrails.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.