Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Sarah Palin Shouldn’t Run (She'd do better promoting conservatism on TV, not as President)
National Review ^ | 11/19/2010 | Mona Charen

Posted on 11/19/2010 6:50:35 AM PST by WebFocus

By telling Barbara Walters that she thinks she can defeat President Obama, Sarah Palin has dimmed hopes cherished by sensible Republicans that she might decide against a run for the White House in 2012. Here are just some of the reasons she should not run.

The Republican nominee should be someone with a vast and impressive record in government and the private sector. Voters chose a novice with plenty of star power in 2008 and will be inclined to swing strongly in the other direction in 2012. Americans will be looking for sober competence, managerial skill, and maturity — not sizzle and flash.

After the 2008 campaign revealed her substantive weaknesses, Palin was advised by those who admired her natural gifts to bone up on policy and devote herself to governing Alaska successfully. Instead, she quit her job as governor after two and a half years, published a book (another is due next week), and seemed to chase money and empty celebrity. Now, rather than being able to highlight the accomplishments of Sarah Palin’s Alaska, we get Sarah Palin’s Alaska, another cheesy entrant in the reality-show genre. She’d so much rather be out dog sledding than in some “dull political office,” she tells the audience. File that.

It’s true. She is wildly popular with a swath of the Republican electorate. And, as a conservative woman politician told me, political consultants (who get paid the big bucks, win or lose) will doubtless descend upon her with game plans showing how she can win in Iowa and then cruise to the nomination. Maybe. But the general election would be a problem, since 53 percent of independent voters view Palin unfavorably along with 81 percent of Democrats, according to a recent Gallup poll.

There is no denying that Sarah Palin has been harshly, sometimes even brutally, treated by the press and the entertainment gaggle. But any prominent Republican must expect and be able to transcend that. Palin compares herself to Reagan. But Reagan didn’t mud-wrestle with the press. Palin seems consumed and obsessed by it, as her rapid Twitter finger attests, and thus she encourages the sniping. She should be presiding over meetings on oil and gas leases in the North Slope, or devising alternatives to Obamacare. Every public spat with Dave Letterman or Politico, or the “lamestream media,” or (God help us) Levi Johnston, diminishes her.

Speaking of television, have you watched “Dancing with the Stars”? Calling the show cheesy would be too generous. Perhaps the former governor should not be blamed for the decisions of her adult daughter. Yet there in the audience we see Sarah and Todd Palin, mugging for the camera and cheering on their unwed-mother daughter as she bumps and grinds to the tune of “Mamma Told Me Not To Come.” Her parents had advised her, the 20-year-old Bristol told an interviewer, that she had to stay “in character” if she expected to win. Being “in character” evidently meant descending to the vulgarity that DWTS peddles on a weekly basis. The mama grizzly was apparently unfazed by, or — equally disturbingly — unaware of, the indignity. And she is supposed to be a conservative culture warrior?

Voters prize judgment, above all, in a presidential candidate. Some of Sarah Palin’s 2010 endorsements were sound and arguably helpful. Others betrayed flightiness and recklessness. Tom Tancredo, Palin’s choice for governor of Colorado, has ridden his anti-immigration hobby-horse in a style perfectly suited to alienate Hispanic voters (describing Miami, for example, as a “Third World city”). Her endorsement of Christine O’Donnell was irresponsible and damaging, losing a seat that would otherwise have been a Republican pick-up. Of course, O’Donnell received an absurdly disproportionate amount of ink and attention during the race (the liberal press naturally seizes upon any opportunity to make conservatives look kooky), but Palin should have anticipated that. Besides, this one cannot be laid at the feet of the biased media. O’Donnell was a thoroughly unqualified candidate.

Palin has many strengths. I admire her fortitude and her principles. Her ability to connect with a crowd is something most politicians can only dream of. I will always remember her 2008 convention speech as a rollicking star turn. She would be terrific as a talk-show host — the new Oprah.

But a presidential candidate? Someone to convince critical independent voters that Republicans can govern successfully? Absolutely not.

— Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; afraidisromney; backstabberromney; charen; charen4romney; charen4romneycare; cowardlyromney; cowardromney; hidingromney; operationleper4mitt; palin; pimpingromney; pimpromney; pimpromneyhere; pimpromneynow; presidency; romneycare; saboteurromney; sarahpalin; timidromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 601-603 next last
To: rbmillerjr

LOL. Wouldn’t it be simple and honest, if the anti-Palin posters would merely name their preferred candidate and move on, given that nobody has announced yet?

They could agree with establishment Mona Charon and then merely state that they prefer milquetoast so and so or fireball so and so.


321 posted on 11/19/2010 12:21:49 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
My comments refer only to her electability which was destroyed when she quit and to her qualifications to hold the toughest job on the planet, which are lacking.

Her activity since quitting has been in two areas, self enrichment and political promotion. She has succeeded wildly in the first (good for her) and moderately in the second (couldn't get Miller elected in her own state). While that's pretty good it does nothing to make her better qualified than she was on the day she quit.

322 posted on 11/19/2010 12:22:22 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I had to go look up the definition of “zot”. Jim R. has the powah!!


323 posted on 11/19/2010 12:23:29 PM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; little jeremiah; ejdrapes

The clueless on here would do well to remember that Obama ran against Palin, not McCain. SHE is the “threat” to the left’s plans.


324 posted on 11/19/2010 12:23:41 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I read 2-3 books a month and have a libary that would put some small towns to shame.

Finished “Roots of Obama’s Rage” last week and currently reading “Six Frigates” (a history of the USN circa 1790-1815).

I have streaming at work because my job allows it and I can work while listening.

But they frown on spending the day reading a book.


325 posted on 11/19/2010 12:23:45 PM PST by ijrazz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I have been awaiting the Huckaboob forces...lol.
I think he and Romney are in cahoots to STOP Sarah Palin.


326 posted on 11/19/2010 12:23:49 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

:)

You betcha!
327 posted on 11/19/2010 12:25:49 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
You're foolish. Obama ran against Palin. He KNEW she was the one he had to beat. And she still is.

Liberals, This Is Proof That Sarah Palin Has Executive Experience: I Present Her Record

328 posted on 11/19/2010 12:26:12 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: ijrazz
Like I said, you need to read more.

Liberals, This Is Proof That Sarah Palin Has Executive Experience: I Present Her Record

And you won't get the truth and ANY news show.

329 posted on 11/19/2010 12:28:16 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
The only reason McCainmutiny didn’t lose worse was because of Palin.

John McCain "rally" (LOL) before Sarah Palin.

PALIN/mccain rally after the VP selection.


330 posted on 11/19/2010 12:29:52 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (NPR: Air America with government funding to keep them alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; lady lawyer
heh

lady lawyer zot.

<grin>

331 posted on 11/19/2010 12:29:54 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Funny how I notice a lot of the people turning up with acute cases of PDS also posted “curious” statements previously...


332 posted on 11/19/2010 12:30:17 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I have been awaiting the Huckaboob forces...

Yeah, but there are only about three of them and they were never all that enthusiastic.

The ones that will probably be the most obnoxious are the ones pushing Jeb Bush. By and large his supporters were delighted that he let Terri get murdered and they adored Charlie Crist to the point that they were actually surprised when he ran as an independent.

333 posted on 11/19/2010 12:31:39 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

:)


334 posted on 11/19/2010 12:32:52 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

OH, a Jeb supporter got the ZOT last night.
Andrea19, IIRC, on the Romney thread I posted.


335 posted on 11/19/2010 12:33:34 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

FR seems to have a large clueless squad that spews the MSM/lefts talking points on Palin.


336 posted on 11/19/2010 12:34:56 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
which is that she quit.

What a savvy move. Nothing like pulling the rug from beneath your enemies and a year later their heads are still spinning.

We don't get to see that much - the media not having control of breaking a candidate!

Go SARAH!! Show the maggots what America is about!


337 posted on 11/19/2010 12:35:22 PM PST by presently no screen name ("Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down.." Mark 7:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Jim’s weeding his garden. :-)


338 posted on 11/19/2010 12:36:15 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
My comments refer only to her electability which was destroyed when she quit and to her qualifications to hold the toughest job on the planet, which are lacking.

Her ability to see that her resignition would be better for the conservative movement as a whole enhanced her electibility in my eyes and most others in the Tea Party movement.

339 posted on 11/19/2010 12:37:10 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top 5 worries of the American Farmer for decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I'm sure you meant Jim Robinson. BTW, great pic.
340 posted on 11/19/2010 12:37:16 PM PST by ru4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 601-603 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson