Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Can’t Play Center (Barry is not ideologically capable of emulating Clinton)
Nationa Review ^ | 11/17/2010 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 11/17/2010 7:04:46 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Should Obama pull a Clinton? This has been a burning question inside the Beltway ever since the polls showed the Great Shellacking bearing down on the White House.

As most know by now, pulling a Clinton isn’t anything kinky; it simply means moving to the center, or “triangulating” between the unpopular Left and the unpopular Right. That’s what President Clinton did after the Democrats’ historic drubbing at the polls in 1994, and it’s what a lot of would-be sages argue President Obama must do now after the rout of 2010.

But the argument is deeply flawed for a few simple reasons: 2011 will be very different from 1995; the Republicans and the Democrats are different from how they were then; and Obama is very, very different from Clinton.

Other than that, the analogy is perfect.

Even outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi concedes the political importance of the economy. In 1995, the economy was poised to take off like a rocket. Today, no one thinks the economy is about to perform in a way that would provide a glide path to reelection for Obama. If at the end of Obama’s first term, near–10 percent unemployment is the “new normal,” as Obama fretted recently on 60 Minutes, then his chances for reelection are bleak — so long as the GOP doesn’t throw him a lifeline, the way it did Clinton in 1995–96.

And the GOP is not only determined not to repeat those mistakes, it is well positioned to avoid them. With Democrats controlling the Senate, it will be much harder for Obama to run against a do-nothing Congress.

As even Newt Gingrich has conceded, he made a lot of mistakes back then, chief among them acting as if the Republican Congress ran the country. No such cockiness has been on display from the GOP since Election Day. “This election wasn’t about us” is a mantra repeated by every member of the leadership.

Moreover, the composition of Congress is very different today. As Ramesh Ponnuru notes in the current issue of National Review, in 1995 the GOP House majority was so narrow that Gingrich had a devil of a time balancing moderates and conservatives. “(John) Boehner’s task will be easier,” Ponnuru writes. “Republicans have the largest majority they have had since the 1940s. For the first time in the modern history of conservatism, the House has an outright conservative majority.” Boehner has the wiggle room to let some Republicans off the hook for tough votes while still having enough left over to win passage.

Speaking of wiggle room, Clinton had the luxury of failure in 1995; Obama has the albatross of success. Because Hillarycare died without even a vote in Congress, Clinton had no major reform to defend. Obamacare is the law. The president cannot tack to the center and defend his signature accomplishment at the same time. Or, to be more precise, the GOP won’t let him.

Even if the GOP were inclined to give Obama breathing room, the Left isn’t. It’s much stronger today than it was in 1995, and the activist core of today’s Democratic party sees itself as an antibody response to Clintonian triangulation. Pulling a Clinton would be seen as flat-out betrayal by Obama’s biggest fans — and by an unapologetic Pelosi, who has decided to shrug off the election results as someone else’s problem.

And even if the Left were to give Obama room to maneuver, there’s little reason to believe Obama could sell a change of heart. Clinton was a creature of Arkansas, and Ozark politics are just a tad more conservative than Hyde Park politics. Clinton is not only endowed with a preternatural gift for faking sincerity, he also had deep experience working across the aisle. Obama’s smooth path to the presidency offered far fewer opportunities for political introspection and the flexibility that comes with it.

Whatever the motivation, Obama’s response to his predicament has been more Pelosian than Clintonian. There’s been less apologizing and more faculty-lounge theorizing about voters too scared to know what’s good for them. That doesn’t suggest he’s ready to reinvent himself.

By no means does this suggest that Obama has no path to reelection. But Clinton’s map won’t get him where he needs to go.

— Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: center; centrist; clinton; obama

1 posted on 11/17/2010 7:04:57 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“By no means does this suggest that Obama has no path to reelection.”

I think everyone knows that if we don’t re-elect this guy America will be called racists by the international community as we were before his initial election.

We should not care and have two years to get comfortable and simply tell the international community to STFU.


2 posted on 11/17/2010 7:07:49 AM PST by edcoil (Today, we start fixing stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama Can’t Play Center (Barry is not ideologically capable of emulating Clinton)

There are innumerable things Barry Soetoro is incapable of. Who else needs a teleprompter to talk to third graders?

3 posted on 11/17/2010 7:08:11 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We all knew he couldn’t play center with his back to the basket (er teleprompter).


4 posted on 11/17/2010 7:11:14 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He doesn’t have the ability to “emulate” a President either.


5 posted on 11/17/2010 7:11:51 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As most know by now, pulling a Clinton isn’t anything kinky;

I must be out of the loop then. Because the first thing I thought when I read the headline and opening sentence was, "Why not? Oh. Right. Because he doesn't like girls."

6 posted on 11/17/2010 7:12:49 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Who else needs a teleprompter to talk to third graders?
_______________________________________________________

Any president who is not a leader and will submit to reading Georgy’s words on a teleprompter.

A true leader leads, a follower, follows.


7 posted on 11/17/2010 7:16:21 AM PST by del4hope (Admendment IV to the US Constitution. Print it and bring it with you when you fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I think we’re getting pretty close to the point where the majority are ShiTFUll of PC and will openly reject it.
The left needs to see this coming and shudder.
Once they no longer have to power to silence their enemies with political correctness,

they cannot win. They cannot survive in an environment where the truth is not suppressed.


8 posted on 11/17/2010 7:25:13 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is “Pulling a Clinton” like pulling a groin muscle?


9 posted on 11/17/2010 8:18:16 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

The other day I pulled a groin muscle, and it wasn’t even my own!


10 posted on 11/17/2010 8:19:02 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
The other day I pulled a groin muscle, and it wasn’t even my own!

Do you work for the TSA?

11 posted on 11/17/2010 8:24:47 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Thank you, thank you. I’ll be here all week. Don’t forget to try the veal.


12 posted on 11/17/2010 8:24:55 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
Do you work for the TSA?

Now that's funny right there.

13 posted on 11/17/2010 8:49:35 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I agree with Goldberg.

Obama is wearing the suicide bomber belt for the far left.

And he doesn't have the key to unlock it, even if he wanted to chicken out.

14 posted on 11/17/2010 8:52:15 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson